Reference of Sumedha and Dipankara Buddha in Sutta (?)

Exploring the Dhamma, as understood from the perspective of the ancient Pali commentaries.
Post Reply
User avatar
faraway
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:17 pm

Reference of Sumedha and Dipankara Buddha in Sutta (?)

Post by faraway »

Hi,

Anyone know which Sutta in Tipitaka that contains about the story or reference about Sumedha ascetic's resolution to become a Buddha under Dipankara Buddha's time?

:anjali:
User avatar
Zom
Posts: 2717
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:38 pm
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg
Contact:

Re: Reference of Sumedha and Dipankara Buddha in Sutta (?)

Post by Zom »

There is no such sutta. Those buddhas are mentioned in Buddhavamsa, a later work, included in Khuddaka Nikaya.
User avatar
faraway
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:17 pm

Re: Reference of Sumedha and Dipankara Buddha in Sutta (?)

Post by faraway »

Zom, thank you for the information.

:anjali:
User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 4647
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Reference of Sumedha and Dipankara Buddha in Sutta (?)

Post by Bhikkhu Pesala »

You can also find a reference to other Buddhas in the Mahāpadāna Sutta of the Dīghanikāya. Vipassī Buddha arose 91 aeons ago, as did Dīpaṅkara who is not mentioned in that Sutta, but is mentioned in the Commentary on the Mahāsatipaṭṭhāna Sutta.
Mahāpadāna Suttaṃ wrote: “Ito so, bhikkhave, ekanavutikappe yaṃ Vipassī Bhagavā arahaṃ sammāsambuddho loke udapādi. Ito so, bhikkhave, ekatiṃse kappe yaṃ sikhī Bhagavā arahaṃ sammāsambuddho loke udapādi. Tasmiññeva kho, bhikkhave, ekatiṃse kappe vessabhū Bhagavā arahaṃ sammāsambuddho loke udapādi. Imasmiññeva kho, bhikkhave, bhaddakappe Kakusandho Bhagavā arahaṃ sammāsambuddho loke udapādi. Imasmiññeva kho, bhikkhave, bhaddakappe Koṇāgamano Bhagavā arahaṃ sammāsambuddho loke udapādi. Imasmiññeva kho, bhikkhave, bhaddakappe Kassapo Bhagavā arahaṃ sammāsambuddho loke udapādi. Imasmiññeva kho, bhikkhave, bhaddakappe ahaṃ etarahi arahaṃ sammāsambuddho loke uppanno.
mahāsatipaṭṭhānasuttavaṇṇanā wrote:Taṇhaṅkara Medhaṅkara Saraṇaṅkara Dīpaṅkara
BlogPāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
User avatar
robertk
Posts: 5638
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:08 am

Re: Reference of Sumedha and Dipankara Buddha in Sutta (?)

Post by robertk »

Zom wrote:There is no such sutta. Those buddhas are mentioned in Buddhavamsa, a later work, included in Khuddaka Nikaya.
the Buddhavamsa is part of the sutta pitaka, not a later work.
User avatar
cooran
Posts: 8503
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: Reference of Sumedha and Dipankara Buddha in Sutta (?)

Post by cooran »

This might be of interest:

http://www.palikanon.com/english/pali_n ... avamsa.htm

With metta,
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 4647
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Reference of Sumedha and Dipankara Buddha in Sutta (?)

Post by Bhikkhu Pesala »

Here's a list of the Twenty-Eight Buddhas on Wikipedia. If anyone finds any more, please let me know :)

This is the Classical Theravāda forum, so whatever it says in the Tipiṭaka should be taken as authoritative, including what it says in the Kesamutti Sutta.

I am a bit puzzled by what it says in my quote above about Vipassī Buddha living 91 aeons ago (ekanavutikappe). According to the list of twenty-eight, and the four Buddhas mentioned in the Mahāsatipaṭṭhāna Sutta Commentary, Vipassī was not one of those born in the Era of Dīpaṅkara.

Such details are of little consequence, or course, but perhaps some scholars could shed some light on other sources for the Chronology.
BlogPāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
Post Reply