Difference between "Modern" and "Classical" Theravada ...

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism
cookiemonster
Posts: 252
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:42 am

Re: Difference between "Modern" and "Classical" Theravada ..

Post by cookiemonster »

So basically it boils down to:

1. Suttas only as authoritative, or
2. Suttas plus the ancient commentaries elevated into authoritative interpretations.

?
User avatar
Modus.Ponens
Posts: 3853
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:38 am
Location: Gallifrey

Re: Difference between "Modern" and "Classical" Theravada ..

Post by Modus.Ponens »

Very roughly, yes. There is, as far as I can tell, a lot of golden material in the commentaries. The problem is when they are elevated to the same level as the suttas. Same with the abhidhamma.
'This is peace, this is exquisite — the resolution of all fabrications; the relinquishment of all acquisitions; the ending of craving; dispassion; cessation; Unbinding.' - Jhana Sutta
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27848
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Difference between "Modern" and "Classical" Theravada ..

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,
Modus.Ponens wrote:There is, as far as I can tell, a lot of golden material in the commentaries. The problem is when they are elevated to the same level as the suttas. Same with the abhidhamma.
...or granted an intellectual monopoly over the interpretation of the suttas.

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Post Reply