Monks and Money; trying to figure out my feelings...

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism
Derek
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:31 pm

Re: Monks and Money; trying to figure out my feelings...

Post by Derek »

Hello, folks,

The actual precept is:

Jatarupa-rajata-patiggahana veramani sikkhapadam samadiyami

I undertake the precept to refrain from accepting gold and silver

So monks only undertake not to accept silver and gold. Refusing to accept paper money and cupro-nickel coins is only an interpretation of this precept.
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Monks and Money; trying to figure out my feelings...

Post by Ben »

Derek wrote:Hello, folks,

The actual precept is:

Jatarupa-rajata-patiggahana veramani sikkhapadam samadiyami

I undertake the precept to refrain from accepting gold and silver
Maybe, but gold and silver was used as money. The intent of the precept is to refrain from accepting and handling money.
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
Dan74
Posts: 4529
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:12 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: Monks and Money; trying to figure out my feelings...

Post by Dan74 »

I'd worry more if the monk or nun were motivated by money, were attached to money, were greedy for money. Monastics don't always get the support they need to survive and besides practical considerations sometimes dictate that in order to be there to teach you the Dhamma, they need to make compromises. As long as they strive to be free of greed, hatred and delusion, the outward form matters little, IMO. True renunciation is in the mind.
_/|\_
daverupa
Posts: 5980
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: Monks and Money; trying to figure out my feelings...

Post by daverupa »

I found that it's very easy for the possession of money to generate the mindset of storing up sensual pleasures as a householder; it feels like having a piece of security, as well as opening up the ability to buy food or entertainment, etc., with great ease when living becomes difficult or stressful, rather than addressing these issues directly.

In short, I think it can easily lead to a palliative approach to life, rather than a curative one, at the individual level; this sort of social lubrication is the function of lay stewards, and ought not be accomplished through relaxation of this rule, I think.
  • "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.

    "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.

- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
User avatar
Hickersonia
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 1:40 pm
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Contact:

Re: Monks and Money; trying to figure out my feelings...

Post by Hickersonia »

Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:Most of the centres in Cincinnati seem to be Mahāyāna. There is one Sri Lanka Vihāra.
Thank you Bhante.

Most of the centers I have found in the area are indeed Mahayana, and I have been to a couple. The Khmer Temple I recently visited isn't even on the list. I have met the Sri Lankan monks also. Ultimately they all seem like nice people even after considering they inadvertently prompted the creation of this thread by their behaviors...

There aren't a whole lot of Buddhist temples or monasteries (not just "centers" but places where there might be monastics present) in the area, unfortunately. Most are lay-only centers and seem to have no real foundation with any particular monastic tradition.
Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:Given that most monks don't observe that rule nowadays, just as most lay Buddhists do not observe the five precepts scrupulously, one has to cultivate a skilful attitude to avoid making unwholesome kamma due to spiritual pride. What others do is their business, what we do is what really matters.
Thank you again... I think this is really the "big point" I need to drill home in my mind. I'll try to let this issue go, but I think I'll still be very, very impressed when I come across a monk who eschews money entirely.

Thank you all, friends, for your input. I really appreciate not being made to feel stupid about this. It looks like a wide variety of opinions on the matter.

Please be well. :anjali:
Hickersonia
http://hickersonia.wordpress.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


"Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of
throwing it at someone else; you are the one getting burned."
User avatar
Virgo
Posts: 1546
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:52 pm
Location: United States

Re: Monks and Money; trying to figure out my feelings...

Post by Virgo »

This maybe useful to the OP, Hickersonia: http://www.abhidhamma.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=94

All the best,

Kevin
User avatar
seeker242
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:01 am

Re: Monks and Money; trying to figure out my feelings...

Post by seeker242 »

Things like this always remind me of Verse 50 of The Dhammapada.

50. "Let none find fault with others; let none see the omissions and commissions of others. But let one see one's own acts, done and undone."

:namaste:
User avatar
Virgo
Posts: 1546
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:52 pm
Location: United States

Re: Monks and Money; trying to figure out my feelings...

Post by Virgo »

seeker242 wrote:Things like this always remind me of Verse 50 of The Dhammapada.

50. "Let none find fault with others; let none see the omissions and commissions of others. But let one see one's own acts, done and undone."

:namaste:
I assume, seeker, this is in reference to my post because I came on very strong (although I may be wrong). However, I have looked at my own actions done, and undone. When I was a bhikkhu I lived very, very purely - mind you, not completely without fault, but I never accepted or used money and only committed very minor . Now I understand that i was only a bhikkhu for six weeks, but that six weeks was very valuable and helped lead not to the shortening of the dispensation, like the careers of monks who use money and commit other offences do.

We have to understand that it's OK to speak up about things that are bad for the Dhamma. IF someone does something bad, it is OK to reprimand them and so forth.

all the best,
Kevin
User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 4646
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Monks and Money; trying to figure out my feelings...

Post by Bhikkhu Pesala »

seeker242 wrote:Things like this always remind me of Verse 50 of The Dhammapada.
That is always a good verse to remember, but don't overlook the rest, e.g.

Verse 76 and Verse 77
“Should one see a wise man, who, like a revealer of treasure,
points out faults and reproves;
let one associate with such a wise person;
it will be better, not worse, for him who associates with such a one. 76

“Let him advise, instruct, and dissuade one from evil;
truly pleasing is he to the good, displeasing is he to the bad.”77
BlogPāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
User avatar
Virgo
Posts: 1546
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:52 pm
Location: United States

Re: Monks and Money; trying to figure out my feelings...

Post by Virgo »

From the Maniculaka Sutta:
But Maniculaka the village headman was unable to convince that assembly.

Then Maniculaka the village headman went to the Blessed One, and having approached the Blessed One bowed to him and sat down at one side. While sitting at one side Maniculaka the village headman said to the Blessed One:

`Venerable Sir, in the king´s palace the king´s retinue were assembled... (He repeated all that had been said above.)... But Venerable Sir, I was not able to convince that assembly.

`Venerable Sir, by thus explaining am I one who speaks what is said by the Blessed One or have I falsely misrepresented the Blessed One? Have I answered in accordance with this Teaching or would someone speaking in accordance with this Teaching find reason to blame me?´

(The Blessed One:) `Truly you, headman, by thus explaining are one who speaks what is said by me and did not falsely misrepresent me. You have answered in accordance with this Teaching and someone speaking in accordance with this Teaching would not find reason to blame you.

`For, headman, gold, silver, and money are not allowable for those monks who are the sons of the Sakyan prince. Those monks who are the sons of the Sakyan prince do not consent to gold, silver, or money. Those monks who are the sons of the Sakyan prince do not accept gold, silver, or money. Those monks who are the sons of the Sakyan prince have renounced gold and gems and are without money.

`Headman, for whoever gold, silver, or money are allowable then for him the five types of sense pleasure are allowable. For whoever the five types of sense pleasure are allowable you can be certain, "He does not possess the nature of a monk, he does not possess the nature of a son of the Sakyan prince."
This is quoted from the article by Bhikkhu Dhamminda quoted in the thread linked to above (http://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.ph ... 20#p264244)
User avatar
seeker242
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:01 am

Re: Monks and Money; trying to figure out my feelings...

Post by seeker242 »

Virgo wrote:
seeker242 wrote:Things like this always remind me of Verse 50 of The Dhammapada.

50. "Let none find fault with others; let none see the omissions and commissions of others. But let one see one's own acts, done and undone."

:namaste:
I assume, seeker, this is in reference to my post because I came on very strong (although I may be wrong).
No, It was just my random thought on the subject as a whole. :smile:
We have to understand that it's OK to speak up about things that are bad for the Dhamma. IF someone does something bad, it is OK to reprimand them and so forth.
Yes, please see below too though. :smile:
Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:That is always a good verse to remember, but don't overlook the rest, e.g.
“Should one see a wise man, who, like a revealer of treasure,
points out faults and reproves;
let one associate with such a wise person;
it will be better, not worse, for him who associates with such a one. 76

“Let him advise, instruct, and dissuade one from evil;
truly pleasing is he to the good, displeasing is he to the bad.”77
I agree with both of the above! But at the same time if there is a person who has done bad and that person is not here, then you are not really reprimanding them but rather just talking about reprimanding them and just talking about their bad thing they have done. This is dangerous territory IMO! Because it can, although not necessarily, lead your mind towards ill will and away from metta. Sometimes unknowingly if you are not careful about it.

I think it's important to be mindful of the fact that this kind of attention, attention on others faults, has the potential to lead the mind away from metta. Like the OP has said "I don't much like "hearing" myself think such snide remarks; I really don't like being overly critical." If putting your mind on others faults causes your mind to become disturbed or upset, if it leads it away from metta, then one could argue this kind of attention is not "appropriate attention" because putting your attention on that has no real benefit but only negative effects. If putting your attention on it has no benefit but only negative effects, then what is the point of doing that? Of course this is not always the case but it can be.

Verse 76 and 77 are good too! But I can't help but think In verse 76 the wise man is talking directly to the person who has done bad, not talking about them, but to them. The same with 77. I just think it's important to be mindful of the fact that attention on others faults can, sometimes unknowingly, turn into something that is not beneficial rather than something that is beneficial. Of course this is not necessarily the case but the potential is there depending on the person. Focusing one's attention on others faults can be dangerous territory for one's own peace and wellbeing! But of course you all probably know all that already. :)

:namaste:
User avatar
Virgo
Posts: 1546
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:52 pm
Location: United States

Re: Monks and Money; trying to figure out my feelings...

Post by Virgo »

seeker242 wrote: But at the same time if there is a person who has done bad and that person is not here, then you are not really reprimanding them but rather just talking about reprimanding them and just talking about their bad thing they have done. This is dangerous territory IMO! Because it can, although not necessarily, lead your mind towards ill will and away from metta. Sometimes unknowingly if you are not careful about it.

I think it's important to be mindful of the fact that this kind of attention, attention on others faults, has the potential to lead the mind away from metta. Like the OP has said "I don't much like "hearing" myself think such snide remarks; I really don't like being overly critical." If putting your mind on others faults causes your mind to become disturbed or upset, if it leads it away from metta, then one could argue this kind of attention is not "appropriate attention" because putting your attention on that has no real benefit but only negative effects. If putting your attention on it has no benefit but only negative effects, then what is the point of doing that? Of course this is not always the case but it can be.
Good points seeker, but I have metta for the monks spoken about and metta for everyone here who will read this thread and possiblty be able to straighten out their views about monks and their using money.

Your point about metta is valid, but only we can know our own mind (know when there is metta or not).

I wish to write more but I have to go now. I will try to write more later.

Peace,

Kevin
Post Reply