NailedJustsit wrote:From OP's first post:chownah wrote:I don't understand your worries. Are you worried about something? If so then what is it.
Seriously. What is there for you to worry about?
chownah
"I am about 40 years old, I live in Japan
For about 20 year of my life I have been a devout Catholic Christian, later on I found out that all the teachings of the bible are essentially faith based
I also found out that one day I will die, and that no teachings alone will be likely to save me."
So it sounds like OP has realized that death is certain, the clock is ticking, and is looking for salvation.
Faith-based against evidence-based
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:06 am
Re: Faith-based against evidence-based
- lyndon taylor
- Posts: 1835
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:41 pm
- Location: Redlands, US occupied Northern Mexico
- Contact:
Re: Faith-based against evidence-based
It would seem with your mindset that Buddhism has nothing to offer you, I suggest you look elsewhere until such a time as your mind is open enough to consider what people are saying to you.
18 years ago I made one of the most important decisions of my life and entered a local Cambodian Buddhist Temple as a temple boy and, for only 3 weeks, an actual Therevada Buddhist monk. I am not a scholar, great meditator, or authority on Buddhism, but Buddhism is something I love from the Bottom of my heart. It has taught me sobriety, morality, peace, and very importantly that my suffering is optional, and doesn't have to run my life. I hope to give back what little I can to the Buddhist community, sincerely former monk John
http://trickleupeconomictheory.blogspot.com/
http://trickleupeconomictheory.blogspot.com/
- PsychedelicSunSet
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:04 pm
Re: Faith-based against evidence-based
Matteo1972 wrote: I am totally open to learn from everybody.
What I do not consider as leaning is reading some long long story that tells you that there are 5 causes that are coming from 4 sub-causes, etc. etc.
This I do not consider learning, this s what I consider reading a story.
Learning means some precise discussion about how to attain enlightenment and some precise evidence on why it has been attained.
If you told me that you (or anyone else) in the world has obtained enlightenment by staying 3 years in a cave and repeating some sutra this would be learning
If you tell me that someone 2000 years ago wrote that anger comes from delusion and that delusion must be stemmed because it leads to blah blah .. this would be just a general story in something not directly related to Enlightenment and would not be what I am interested in hearing about.
By the logic you've been using in this thread, it seems like what you say is learning is also just a story. I feel as though if someone else were to say something along those lines, you would simply ask how you know those particular things lead to his enlightenment, and how you know he's actually enlightened. From what I can gather about how you perceive things to be true and not true, the only way you'll believe something is through direct experience. Which if correct (which I'm assuming you'll say I'm not) leads me to ask, why are you asking us all these questions? If you only believe what you experience, it seems useless to ask about such topics as you won't know for sure if what people say is in fact the truth, and that your time would be better spent doing an internal investigation instead of an external investigation.
I hope you find ease and peace in your journey.
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:06 am
Re: Faith-based against evidence-based
Not to his particular enlightenment, but to the enlightenment.PsychedelicSunSet wrote: By the logic you've been using in this thread, it seems like what you say is learning is also just a story. I feel as though if someone else were to say something along those lines, you would simply ask how you know those particular things lead to his enlightenment, and how you know he's actually enlightened.
after all, enlightenment is all what Buddhism is about.
No enlightnenment = no Buddha.
So, at first, we must ascertain taht there is an Enlightenment and that Buddha teachings can bring there.
If this is not the case, all the Tipitaka and all the teachings are not worth anything.
Dont you agree?
Please tell
The reason is quite simplePsychedelicSunSet wrote:From what I can gather about how you perceive things to be true and not true, the only way you'll believe something is through direct experience. Which if correct (which I'm assuming you'll say I'm not) leads me to ask, why are you asking us all these questions? If you only believe what you experience, it seems useless to ask about such topics as you won't know for sure if what people say is in fact the truth, and that your time would be better spent doing an internal investigation instead of an external investigation.
There are hundreds of religions and thousands of teachers.
In one lifetime you have no time to check them all.
So, at the end, you need to try and check the religions that at least promise to lead you somewhere.
If they do not even promise you to lead you anywhere, I can easily stick to Zen where at least satori is attainable, or so they say.
I have heard quite a lot of people claiming that they have achieved satori.
So I am curious to know if there is the same with Theravada, some evidence that it actually leads to absence of suffering.
So far, I got no positive answer, but still looking for.
I will try to check directly to Thai, but if all the answer I can get is.. sit here for 30 years because some old book written by someone told that you may get a favorable birth, well.. I would then go back to Zen
However, there was someone who said very interesting things:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qu7mtlbVBOA
Please hear from minute 3:35
ThanksPsychedelicSunSet wrote:I hope you find ease and peace in your journey.
Re: Faith-based against evidence-based
This is the strangest question I have heard in a while. This is so upside-down it is baffling to me. My earlier statement about how we are talking past each other, on different frequencies, seems spot on.Matteo1972 wrote:How do you know this?kc2dpt wrote:Buddhism is nothing other than practical things such as how do you reach Enlightenment.
As someone told you so and you believed it?
As from your personal experience?
In my garage I have a repair manual for my motorcycle. It is filled with nothing other than practical things relating to fixing my motorcycle. How do I know this? Because someone told me and I believed it? No. I know this because I opened it up and read it. I can see with my own eyes and comprehend with my own intellect that the words in that book pertain to practical matters of motorcycle repair. This is not religion, this is not a story. It is instructions pertaining to a topic, words which anyone with a decent command of the language can understand. In the exact same way, Theravada scriptures are practical instructions for realizing the ending of suffering. The Buddha says X is caused by Y, stopping Y also stops X, this is how one stops Y, etc. How do I know this? Because I can read.
Whether the instructions work, that is a different question entirely. But for you to ask me how I know "Buddhism is nothing other than practical things such as how do you reach Enlightenment"? I know because I know how to read.
Really, I am baffled. Are you not paying attention to your own questions? Is English not a language you are comfortable with? This is really getting very odd.
Again, this is so upside-down. If I wanted to learn how repair my motorcycle I would need to learn how a combustion engine works, how the fuel and the oil and air and the electricity all work together in proper balance, how frame geometry affects stiffness and handling and safety and comfort. This is learning.What I do not consider as leaning is reading some long long story that tells you that there are 5 causes that are coming from 4 sub-causes, etc. etc.
This I do not consider learning, this s what I consider reading a story.
This is not learning. This is hand-holding. This is a parent holding a child's hand as they cross a stream. "Come little one, I will bring you across." This is blind faith and blind following, the furthest thing from learning. If my motorcycle broke down one day and a mechanic told me "unscrew this, file that, replace that fluid, tighten the other thing" I might get running again but I would not have learned anything.Learning means some precise discussion about how to attain enlightenment and some precise evidence on why it has been attained.
I think it would be impossible for one to say more clearly than you just have that one is not interested in Theravada Buddhism.If you told me that you (or anyone else) in the world has obtained enlightenment by staying 3 years in a cave and repeating some sutra this would be learning
If you tell me that someone 2000 years ago wrote that anger comes from delusion and that delusion must be stemmed because it leads to blah blah .. this would be just a general story in something not directly related to Enlightenment and would not be what I am interested in hearing about.
And that's fine. Everybody's into different things. You have a very strange concept of "learning", of "evidence", of "faith". It seems to me very clear what you are looking for is not this. I wish you the best of luck in your search and I hope you find what you are looking for.
- Peter
Be heedful and you will accomplish your goal.
Be heedful and you will accomplish your goal.
Re: Faith-based against evidence-based
Perhaps it would help if you would clearly elucidate what exactly you are seeking?
What question do you want answered?
What question do you want answered?
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:06 am
Re: Faith-based against evidence-based
And then you tried and repaired the motorcycle.kc2dpt wrote: This is the strangest question I have heard in a while. This is so upside-down it is baffling to me. My earlier statement about how we are talking past each other, on different frequencies, seems spot on.
In my garage I have a repair manual for my motorcycle. It is filled with nothing other than practical things relating to fixing my motorcycle. How do I know this? Because someone told me and I believed it? No. I know this because I opened it up and read it. I can see with my own eyes and comprehend with my own intellect that the words in that book pertain to practical matters of motorcycle repair. This is not religion, this is not a story. It is instructions pertaining to a topic, words which anyone with a decent command of the language can understand. In the exact same way, Theravada scriptures are practical instructions for realizing the ending of suffering. The Buddha says X is caused by Y, stopping Y also stops X, this is how one stops Y, etc. How do I know this? Because I can read.
Whether the instructions work, that is a different question entirely. But for you to ask me how I know "Buddhism is nothing other than practical things such as how do you reach Enlightenment"? I know because I know how to read.
And then, after and only after you have been able to repair your motorcycle you understood that the manual is OK
If instead of having the manual of repairing the motorcycle you had a manual for using your air conditioner you would not be able to repair the motorcycle
The manual would be the wrong one.
Now, can I kindly ask you if using the manual (=i.e. the Tipitaka) you were able to repair your motorcycle (i.e. end your suffering) or at least have been able to see anyone repairing theirs (i.e. other people reaching the end of suffering)?
If not, what would be the manual worth?
I can also write a motorcycle manual.
It would be totally a wrong one, since I do not know how to repair, but I can write it.
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:06 am
Re: Faith-based against evidence-based
How do you know if you know how the engine works?kc2dpt wrote: Again, this is so upside-down. If I wanted to learn how repair my motorcycle I would need to learn how a combustion engine works, how the fuel and the oil and air and the electricity all work together in proper balance, how frame geometry affects stiffness and handling and safety and comfort. This is learning.
If, applying what you have studied, you are able to fix an engine!!
If, after studying for years you are not able to fix an engine, what is what you studied good for?
Even more, how can you even know what you have studied?
Maybe you just studied hot air.
The proof is in the pudding!!
Now, after years of trying, have you been able to fix your engine?
If not, how can you know maybe you are using the wrong manual?
Re: Faith-based against evidence-based
Actually, the idiom is: "the proof of the pudding is in its eating".Matteo1972 wrote:The proof is in the pudding!!
Which, I believe, is a good lesson for you. You need to apply the Dhamma in your own daily life to see the benefit. And the benefit of Buddhism isn't just in the ultimate end result which is awakening. The application of the Dhamma gives extraordinary benefit "here and now". Even if there is no awakening, the practice of Dhamma is more worthwhile than anything else.
Since you have already linked to a video of Ajahn Chah, and I assume that he resonates with you, then why not get instruction from a teacher who was a student of Ajahn Chah.
All the best,
Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road
Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725
Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global Relief • UNHCR
e: [email protected]..
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road
Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725
Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global Relief • UNHCR
e: [email protected]..
Re: Faith-based against evidence-based
I am wondering if the OP is interesting is applying the Dhamma, is interested in liberation.
I can see a great interest in questioning. Almost an obsession. There is a meditative method when you focus all your doubts into one. Question the nature of reality/mind 'what is it?' or a koan like "Mu". Then there is a potential benefit. To question without deep investigation is a waste of energy - spinning the wheels.
I can see a great interest in questioning. Almost an obsession. There is a meditative method when you focus all your doubts into one. Question the nature of reality/mind 'what is it?' or a koan like "Mu". Then there is a potential benefit. To question without deep investigation is a waste of energy - spinning the wheels.
_/|\_
Re: Faith-based against evidence-based
A word of advise, show some sincerity and humility when you see a Thai master over there. You'll just waste all your time, money and effort if you refer to the Tipitaka and the Buddha as "some old book written by someone". Remember that wonderful Zen simile, gotta empty your cup first before you can get some good tea. Good luck..Matteo1972 wrote:So far, I got no positive answer, but still looking for.
I will try to check directly to Thai, but if all the answer I can get is.. sit here for 30 years because some old book written by someone told that you may get a favorable birth, well.. I would then go back to Zen
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:06 am
Re: Faith-based against evidence-based
Yes, you are right.santa100 wrote:A word of advise, show some sincerity and humility when you see a Thai master over there. You'll just waste all your time, money and effort if you refer to the Tipitaka and the Buddha as "some old book written by someone". Remember that wonderful Zen simile, gotta empty your cup first before you can get some good tea. Good luck..Matteo1972 wrote:So far, I got no positive answer, but still looking for.
I will try to check directly to Thai, but if all the answer I can get is.. sit here for 30 years because some old book written by someone told that you may get a favorable birth, well.. I would then go back to Zen
I apologize for lacking of respect, that was not my intention.
What I meant to say is that is that we do not know for sure who wrote each part of the Tipitaka and if the writers were enlightened or not.
Again, my apologizes.
Re: Faith-based against evidence-based
I think you're satisfied with your life, Matteo. Perhaps even really impressed with what you've accomplished. There's nothing wrong with that. I'm glad for you. But I think it causes you to take the dhamma as criticism instead of advice.
“Life is swept along, short is the life span; no shelters exist for one who has reached old age. Seeing clearly this danger in death, a seeker of peace should drop the world’s bait.” SN 1.3
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 2:06 am
Re: Faith-based against evidence-based
I was planning to follow this advice.Ben wrote:Actually, the idiom is: "the proof of the pudding is in its eating".
Which, I believe, is a good lesson for you. You need to apply the Dhamma in your own daily life to see the benefit. And the benefit of Buddhism isn't just in the ultimate end result which is awakening. The application of the Dhamma gives extraordinary benefit "here and now". Even if there is no awakening, the practice of Dhamma is more worthwhile than anything else.
Since you have already linked to a video of Ajahn Chah, and I assume that he resonates with you, then why not get instruction from a teacher who was a student of Ajahn Chah.
All the best,
Ben
The reason I am eager to go to Wat Pah Nanachat is exactly as it was established by Ajahn Chah.
I found the words of Ajahn Chah of the most interest as they deal with a very important point: the (non) existence of the I.
actually, it is precisely as I heard such words from my current zen master 10 years ago that I came to Japan.
It looks like Zen and the teachings of Ajahn Chah have something in common
Re: Faith-based against evidence-based
Is there salvation? How do you know that there is salvation?Matteo1972 wrote:NailedJustsit wrote:From OP's first post:chownah wrote:I don't understand your worries. Are you worried about something? If so then what is it.
Seriously. What is there for you to worry about?
chownah
"I am about 40 years old, I live in Japan
For about 20 year of my life I have been a devout Catholic Christian, later on I found out that all the teachings of the bible are essentially faith based
I also found out that one day I will die, and that no teachings alone will be likely to save me."
So it sounds like OP has realized that death is certain, the clock is ticking, and is looking for salvation.
And very importantly, salvation from what?
Did you read about it in a book? Did someone tell you that Jesus had given them salvation? Do you have faith in salvation?
If you imagine salvation without you, how would it be?
Also, you have still not answered my questions about your meaning for the Lennon and zen quotes.....I'm interested in how you interpret them.
chownah