Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Exploring Theravāda's connections to other paths - what can we learn from other traditions, religions and philosophies?
Post Reply
danieLion
Posts: 1947
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 4:49 am

Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Post by danieLion »

Can Buddhism be improved upon? Was the Buddha perfect?

Currently, I'm inclined to say "yes" to the first question and "no" to the second.

Kindly,
dL
User avatar
cooran
Posts: 8503
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Post by cooran »

Hello Daniel,

Please expand on your post, and present any reasons you see as supporting your statements.

With metta,
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
User avatar
Kusala
Posts: 1144
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:02 am

Re: Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Post by Kusala »

danieLion wrote:Can Buddhism be improved upon? Was the Buddha perfect?

Currently, I'm inclined to say "yes" to the first question and "no" to the second.

Kindly,
dL
Yes, Buddhism can be improved, but would it be Buddhism? Yes, the Buddha was perfect.
"He, the Blessed One, is indeed the Noble Lord, the Perfectly Enlightened One;
He is impeccable in conduct and understanding, the Serene One, the Knower of the Worlds;
He trains perfectly those who wish to be trained; he is Teacher of gods and men; he is Awake and Holy. "

--------------------------------------------
"The Dhamma is well-expounded by the Blessed One,
Apparent here and now, timeless, encouraging investigation,
Leading to liberation, to be experienced individually by the wise. "
dagon
Posts: 526
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 12:45 am

Re: Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Post by dagon »

danieLion wrote:Can Buddhism be improved upon? Was the Buddha perfect?

Currently, I'm inclined to say "yes" to the first question and "no" to the second.

Kindly,
dL
Yes Buddhism can be improved in that we can improve our morality, compassion and understanding. He taught that the truth is within and gave us a method to see it – what we can not see or where there is lack of clarity just provides us with the knowledge that we can/should improve. Now to go away and try and practice what I preach. :embarassed:

regards
paul
User avatar
DNS
Site Admin
Posts: 17169
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
Contact:

Re: Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Post by DNS »

It depends upon what you mean by "Buddhism." Is it the Dhamma-Vinaya as taught by the Buddha? The Dharma by Mahayana? Vajrayana? Is it how Buddhism is practiced today?

It depends upon what you mean by "perfect." Is it perfect as in omniscient? Is is perfect as in never making a mistake? Or something else?
danieLion
Posts: 1947
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 4:49 am

Re: Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Post by danieLion »

David N. Snyder wrote:It depends upon what you mean by "Buddhism." Is it the Dhamma-Vinaya as taught by the Buddha? The Dharma by Mahayana? Vajrayana? Is it how Buddhism is practiced today?

It depends upon what you mean by "perfect." Is it perfect as in omniscient? Is is perfect as in never making a mistake? Or something else?
Hi David,
In this topic by Buddhism I mean the Buddha-Dhamma (please correct me if I'm wrong, but that's basically the same thing as Dhamma-Vinaya, right?). In this topic by perfect I mean never making a mistake.
Kindly,
dL
Jhana4
Posts: 1331
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 5:20 pm
Location: U.S.A., Northeast

Re: Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Post by Jhana4 »

danieLion wrote:Can Buddhism be improved upon? Was the Buddha perfect?

Currently, I'm inclined to say "yes" to the first question and "no" to the second.

Kindly,
dL
I remember being told that the monks in a temple endured freezing temperatures. They wouldn't adjust the thermostat in the temple because of an ancient rule forbidding monks from starting fires/causing heat. That rule was made because some monks tried to start a fire, a snake in the wood pile freaked at them, scared the monks, who disturbed the Buddha with their yelling.

There are tons of things like this that could easily be cut out or modernized, so I can't agree with you.

The Pali Canon remains untranslated for many languages and the translations that exist are mediocre in my opinion. Things could definately be improved by making more translations, modern translations from scratch, and translations for multiple biases ( academic, monastic, etc ).

So, I disagree with you again
In reading the scriptures, there are two kinds of mistakes:
One mistake is to cling to the literal text and miss the inner principles.
The second mistake is to recognize the principles but not apply them to your own mind, so that you waste time and just make them into causes of entanglement.
User avatar
DNS
Site Admin
Posts: 17169
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
Contact:

Re: Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Post by DNS »

Actually, according to the Vinaya the rules were changed quite a bit as the need arose. I remember one in particular where the Buddha did not allow the monks and nuns to wear leather sandals but then allowed it when they were in a different province where it was the custom (as long as no being was killed to make the leather). So you could call this an "improvement" or you could say that is a built-in structure to allow for adjustments. The Buddha also allowed the minor rules to be abolished after his paranibbana, again showing his flexibility.

Can the Buddha make a mistake? Again, it is complicated. He was fully enlightened, so had perfect wisdom. But even then, he gave a speech on the foulness of the body and returned later to find many monks had committed suicide as a result of hearing that speech. The Milindipana explains that one, that it is not omniscient in the theistic sense.

From an older thread on omniscience:
Dhammanando wrote: "Knowable things" (ñeyya dhamma) is an important qualification and one that usually gets overlooked by those modern scholars who assert that latterday Buddhists came to exaggerate the Buddha's cognitive range. The Buddha, according to the Pali commentators is able to know all knowable things, but the commentators don't claim that all things are knowable.
User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 4644
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Post by Bhikkhu Pesala »

If a Fully Enlightened, Sammāsambuddha, could make mistakes then he would not be a Perfect One. Imperfect beings can easily misinterpret his teaching due to their partial understanding.

The Vinaya rule prohibits a monk from lighting a fire to warm himself, and for no other reason. There is no offence if he is sick. To practice forbearance to forestall the arising of attachment to sensual pleasures, and to maintain frugality out of compassion for one's supporters who pay the bills is not self-mortification. However, one should not go to such extremes that one becomes sick. If one gets sick, then one will be a greater burden on supporters.

The Buddha did not intervene to prevent the suicide of some forest dwelling monks, because he knew that their past kamma was so severe that nothing could prevent it's bearing fruit. Likewise, he did not intervene when Moggallāna was being beaten to death by hired thugs. In the case of Angulimāla, the Buddha could and did intervene to prevent him committing the heinous crime of killing his own mother.
BlogPāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
danieLion
Posts: 1947
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 4:49 am

Re: Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Post by danieLion »

Hi David,
David N. Snyder wrote:He was fully enlightened, so had perfect wisdom.
I agree. But this does not imply he never made mistakes or that he was omniscient.
Kindly,
dL
User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 4644
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Post by Bhikkhu Pesala »

All Arahants, let alone Omniscient Buddhas, are incapable of taking a wrong course through greed, ill-will, fear, or delusion.

So what mistakes could be made by the Buddha, and whose judgement is so profound that they are able to declare that such and such an action taken by the Buddha was a “mistake.”

If he made any mistake at all, it was propagating a teaching that fools could criticise and find fault with to their own detriment. If he had said nothing, no one could blame the blameless one.
BlogPāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
danieLion
Posts: 1947
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 4:49 am

Re: Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Post by danieLion »

Hi Pesala,
Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:If a Fully Enlightened, Sammāsambuddha, could make mistakes then he would not be a Perfect One. Imperfect beings can easily misinterpret his teaching due to their partial understanding.
This like the snake eating its tail. If misinterpretation is a condition of imperfection, then how do we--imperfect and impartially understanding entities--even know viewing the Buddha as perfect or omniscient is not itself misinterpratation?
Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:The Vinaya rule prohibits a monk from lighting a fire to warm himself, and for no other reason. There is no offence if he is sick. To practice forbearance to forestall the arising of attachment to sensual pleasures, and to maintain frugality out of compassion for one's supporters who pay the bills is not self-mortification. However, one should not go to such extremes that one becomes sick. If one gets sick, then one will be a greater burden on supporters.

The Buddha did not intervene to prevent the suicide of some forest dwelling monks, because he knew that their past kamma was so severe that nothing could prevent it's bearing fruit. Likewise, he did not intervene when Moggallāna was being beaten to death by hired thugs. In the case of Angulimāla, the Buddha could and did intervene to prevent him committing the heinous crime of killing his own mother.
Case in point. You're imperfect, yet seem to be suggesting here that you have complete understanding and a perfect interpretation of these events as implying the Buddha's perfection and omniscience.

If the Buddha were perfect and omniscient, why did he initially doubt his ability to teach the Dhamma? If he was omniscient, he would have been able to percieve around the obstacles he faced. He didn't. His first attempt to teach the Dhamma was a failure. And if he was perfect and omniscient, why didn't he foresee all the problems that would arise by not only approving the dismissal of the minor Vinaya rules, but also of distingushing between the minor and major rules? And why didnt' he foresee all the conflicts that would arise that led to the highly schismatic nature of the events we now call the history of Buddhism?
Kindly,
dL
User avatar
Kusala
Posts: 1144
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:02 am

Re: Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Post by Kusala »

danieLion wrote:Hi Pesala,
Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:If a Fully Enlightened, Sammāsambuddha, could make mistakes then he would not be a Perfect One. Imperfect beings can easily misinterpret his teaching due to their partial understanding.
This like the snake eating its tail. If misinterpretation is a condition of imperfection, then how do we--imperfect and impartially understanding entities--even know viewing the Buddha as perfect or omniscient is not itself misinterpratation?
Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:The Vinaya rule prohibits a monk from lighting a fire to warm himself, and for no other reason. There is no offence if he is sick. To practice forbearance to forestall the arising of attachment to sensual pleasures, and to maintain frugality out of compassion for one's supporters who pay the bills is not self-mortification. However, one should not go to such extremes that one becomes sick. If one gets sick, then one will be a greater burden on supporters.

The Buddha did not intervene to prevent the suicide of some forest dwelling monks, because he knew that their past kamma was so severe that nothing could prevent it's bearing fruit. Likewise, he did not intervene when Moggallāna was being beaten to death by hired thugs. In the case of Angulimāla, the Buddha could and did intervene to prevent him committing the heinous crime of killing his own mother.
Case in point. You're imperfect, yet seem to be suggesting here that you have complete understanding and a perfect interpretation of these events as implying the Buddha's perfection and omniscience.

If the Buddha were perfect and omniscient, why did he initially doubt his ability to teach the Dhamma? If he was omniscient, he would have been able to percieve around the obstacles he faced. He didn't. His first attempt to teach the Dhamma was a failure. And if he was perfect and omniscient, why didn't he foresee all the problems that would arise by not only approving the dismissal of the minor Vinaya rules, but also of distingushing between the minor and major rules? And why didnt' he foresee all the conflicts that would arise that led to the highly schismatic nature of the events we now call the history of Buddhism?
Kindly,
dL
"In the same way, in the course of the future there will be monks who won't listen when discourses that are words of the Tathagata - deep, deep in their meaning, transcendent, connected with emptiness - are being recited. They won't lend ear, won't set their hearts on knowing them, won't regard these teachings as worth grasping or mastering. But they will listen when discourses that are literary works - the works of poets, elegant in sound, elegant in rhetoric, the work of outsiders, words of disciples - are recited. They will lend ear and set their hearts on knowing them. They will regard these teachings as worth grasping & mastering."

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
"He, the Blessed One, is indeed the Noble Lord, the Perfectly Enlightened One;
He is impeccable in conduct and understanding, the Serene One, the Knower of the Worlds;
He trains perfectly those who wish to be trained; he is Teacher of gods and men; he is Awake and Holy. "

--------------------------------------------
"The Dhamma is well-expounded by the Blessed One,
Apparent here and now, timeless, encouraging investigation,
Leading to liberation, to be experienced individually by the wise. "
User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 4644
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Post by Bhikkhu Pesala »

Daniel Lion wrote:This like the snake eating its tail. If misinterpretation is a condition of imperfection, then how do we--imperfect and impartially understanding entities--even know viewing the Buddha as perfect or omniscient is not itself misinterpretation?
All it is saying is since we are imperfect we are not in a position to accuse the Buddha of being imperfect, or of propagating an imperfect teaching. If there's something we don't yet understand, some Vinaya rule that doesn't seem to make sense, the thing to do is to make a thorough inquiry from those who are experts in the Vinaya.

Those monks, are in my opinion, are being over-scrupulous about turning on the heating if it is to the point of making themselves ill, but that's their judgement to make, not mine. I am not living in their monastery.

To blame the rule is like blaming the speed limit as being too low when stopped for speeding.
BlogPāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
User avatar
gavesako
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:16 pm

Re: Improving Buddhism/The Imperfect Buddha

Post by gavesako »

Growing the Dharma: Buddhism’s Religious Spadework. Draft, July 2013.
“The individual or collective Western response has often much like that of the new landowner who discovers an overgrown but still potentially productive corn field on his property and with limited understanding of both corn and non-corn, dauntlessly hacks away with a machete only to destroy half of the corn and to leave half of the undergrowth, then plants one row of Monsanto super-corn and row of squash to make it look right. It looks pretty good, so we call it Western Buddhism and expect it to save Buddhism from centuries of Asian misunderstanding and cultural accretions. We have all the hubris and discernment-level of rowdy teenagers.”

http://bhikkhucintita.wordpress.com/boo ... u-cintita/

:reading: :candle:
Bhikkhu Gavesako
Kiṃkusalagavesī anuttaraṃ santivarapadaṃ pariyesamāno... (MN 26)

Access to Insight - Theravada texts
Ancient Buddhist Texts - Translations and history of Pali texts
Dhammatalks.org - Sutta translations
Post Reply