Sotapanna and five precepts

Buddhist ethical conduct including the Five Precepts (Pañcasikkhāpada), and Eightfold Ethical Conduct (Aṭṭhasīla).
SarathW
Posts: 21184
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: Sotapanna and five precepts

Post by SarathW »

I found further information regarding this subject in the attached link. I hope that may some help for others looking answers to a similar question.

http://static.sirimangalo.org//mahasi/A ... 0Sutta.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The extract from this Sutta as follows.

GENUINE SOTAPAN

It is important to bear in mind that for the sincere yogī conformity to the moral precepts is to be natural and spontaneous and does not require deliberate effort or a sense of self-imposed duty. It implies moral purity rooted in freedom from evil desire and violent, evil passions. This is not to say that initially there is no need for the yogī to exercise self-restraint to make himself morally pure. What we mean is that he should aim at moral purity that is invulnerable to any violent desire to commit moral transgressions. Therefore he needs to examine himself to see whether he has achieved such kind of moral purity. Otherwise he may run the risk of being deluded like one of my former disciples.

Once a lay man came to me. He was not an ordinary person but an educated and well-informed Buddhist. He said that after he had meditated for several times he was declared to be a sotāpan by his teacher. In the Piṭaka there is no mention, no instance of such a verdict being given by Arahat other than the Buddha. We always consider it inadvisable to make such kind of judgment. On the other hand we only give sermons on the stages of insight-knowledge that will provide the basis for assessing one' spiritual progress.

Nevertheless, because of his strong faith in his teacher, the man believed himself to be a sotāpan and observed the five precept strictly. Then one day he reported his religious experience to an elderly monk. The 90-year old monk still living and well versed in the Piṭaka is intimate with me. The man told the old monk about his vision of the elements and phenomena evaporating during his practice of meditation and about the verdict of his teacher.

Then the learned Sayādaw said that he was talking nonsense and that there was nothing to warrant his understanding of the Dhamma, let a lone his claim to be a sotāpan Ariya. The disillusioned man told me that after his interview with the outspoken Sayādaw, he no longer cared much for the strict observance of the five precepts. I advised him not to do like that but to continue to lead a good moral life, whatever other people said about him. It is necessary for the yogī to avoid becoming a self-styled sotāpan like that lay disciple.
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27839
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sotapanna and five precepts

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings Sarath,
SarathW wrote:Is it a necessary prerequisite that Sotapanna/Chula Sorapanna person strictly observing five precepts? What will happen to a Sotapanna person if he break one of the precepts?
Well, Channa the arahant didn't... and what became of him? Arahantship.

Consider also the following words from Nanavira Thera...

Source: (http://nanavira.xtreemhost.com/index.ph ... &Itemid=50" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; )
Nanavira Thera wrote:Why am I glad that you are shocked to learn that a sekha bhikkhu can be fond of talk (and worse)? Because it gives me the opportunity of insisting that unless you bring the sekha down to earth the Buddha's Teaching can never be a reality for you. So long as you are content to put the sotāpanna on a pedestal well out of reach, it can never possibly occur to you that it is your duty to become sotāpanna yourself (or at least to make the attempt) here and now in this very life; for you will simply take it as axiomatic that you cannot succeed. As Kierkegaard puts it,
Whatever is great in the sphere of the universally human must...not be communicated as a subject for admiration, but as an ethical requirement. (CUP, p. 320)
This means that you are not required to admire a sotāpanna, but to become one.

Let me illustrate the matter in a different way. It is possible that you were living as a young man in India in the Buddha's day, and that at the same time there was a young girl of a neighbouring family who had been with her parents to hear the Buddha teach. And she may have understood the Buddha's Teaching and become sotāpanna. And perhaps she might have been given to you in marriage. And you, being a puthujjana, would not know that she was a sekha (for remember, a puthujjana cannot recognize an ariya—an ariya can only be recognized by another ariya). But even though she was sotāpanna she might have loved you, and loved being loved by you, and loved bearing your children, and enjoyed dressing beautifully and entertaining guests and going to entertainments, and even been pleased at the admiration of other men. And she might have taken a pride in working to keep your house in order, and enjoyed talking to you and to your friends and relations. But every now and again, when she was alone, she would have called to mind her sotāpanna's understanding of the true nature of things and been secretly ashamed and disgusted at still finding delight in all these satisfactions (which she would see as essentially dukkha). But, being busy with her duties and pleasures as your wife, she would not have had the time to do much practice, and would have had to be content with the thought that she had only seven more human births to endure at the most.

Now suppose that one day you had gone to see the Buddha, and he had told you that your wife was not a puthujjana like yourself, but an ariya, one of the Elect—would you have been content to put her out of reach on a pedestal (where she would, no doubt, have been very unhappy), saying to yourself 'Ah, that is too difficult an attainment for a humble person like me'? Or would not rather your masculine pride have been stung to the quick and be smarting at the thought that your devoted and submissive wife should be 'one advanced in the Dhamma', while you, the lord and master of the household, remained an ordinary person? I think, perhaps, that you would have made an effort at least to become the equal of your wife.
Further reading:

If a stream-winner...
http://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=4241" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Parth
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:53 pm

Re: Sotapanna and five precepts

Post by Parth »

Don't remember the sutta but what I understand is that the things which a sotapanna can't do are :

1. Patricide
2. Matricide
3. Hurting a Buddha ( kill nobody can)
4. Cause schism in Buddha's order
5. Kill an Arhant

This are probably the worst crimes which a sotapanna can't do. On other things they may commit but will immediately recognise the mistake and make amends.

Regards

Parth
xtracorrupt
Posts: 97
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:47 pm

Re: Sotapanna and five precepts

Post by xtracorrupt »

SarathW wrote:According to Narada’s Manual of Abhidhamma (page 42) it says:

"A Sotàpanna (Stream-Winner) eradicates the 1st,
2nd, 5th, 6th, and 11th types of consciousness as he has
destroyed the two Fetters (Saüyojana)—Sakkàyadiññhi
(Self-illusion) and Vicikicchà (Doubts)."

Is it a necessary prerequisite that Sotapanna/Chula Sorapanna person strictly observing five precepts? What will happen to a Sotapanna person if he break one of the precepts?

Link: http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/abhidhamma.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Hi SarathW,

remember the five percepts are more of guidelines then rules, they are used to help guide people to have good will, and rich intention, etc

Remember that there is nothing you must actually do, and you are not required to be attached to these percepts, however most would see being attached to these percepts as beautiful because it promotes good will

It also seems In my perspective, that you might have possibly accomplished becoming a stream enterer, in this case I would advise questioning the next fetters that you should abandon on your journey. Why do i need to feel sensual pain? Is sensual suffering a delusion in order to try and fool myself into thinking i must continue living in this world? What's more important then my happiness and the happiness of other people? what make's my happiness more important then another person's happiness? What use does leaving a reputation have unless it brings happiness ?

also a sotapanna does not have to be reborn 7 times in order to attain nirvana, any sentient being can attain nirvana in any life, it all depends on the will

Try and learn with good intentions, try and awaken yourself so you can be free of suffering and then help other people be free of suffering


Already you should be applauded for your will to understandment

If you have any questions, please do not be afraid to ask

:namaste:
theres is no need for needing
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Sotapanna and five precepts

Post by Ben »

xtracorrupt wrote:If you have any questions, please do not be afraid to ask
You? You've got to be joking!
You'd be better off keeping silent, learning about and practicing Dhamma - that is if you're actually interested in coming out of your delusional thinking.
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6646
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: Sotapanna and five precepts

Post by Cittasanto »

Ben wrote:
xtracorrupt wrote:If you have any questions, please do not be afraid to ask
You? You've got to be joking!
You'd be better off keeping silent, learning about and practicing Dhamma - that is if you're actually interested in coming out of your delusional thinking.
:anjali: :anjali: :anjali:
Image
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
xtracorrupt
Posts: 97
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:47 pm

Re: Sotapanna and five precepts

Post by xtracorrupt »

Ben wrote:
xtracorrupt wrote:If you have any questions, please do not be afraid to ask
You? You've got to be joking!
You'd be better off keeping silent, learning about and practicing Dhamma - that is if you're actually interested in coming out of your delusional thinking.
Why , what harm would me spreading information cause? Maby it could cause misunderstandment and causing delusion but I think the possible understandment hold outweighs this

Also its pleasing to see that you are attached to the dhamma, this is a good sign of good intention :clap:

:namaste:
theres is no need for needing
SarathW
Posts: 21184
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: Sotapanna and five precepts

Post by SarathW »

Most of the text I read describe the Sotapanna as the person who eradicated first three fetters.
Interestingly the page 320 of attached link says that Sotapanna also a person who has abandons unwholesome states such as greed, hatred, and delusion strong enough to lead to the plane of misery.
So this is a confirmation that a Sotapanna is a person who observes five precepts.

http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/printguna.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
santa100
Posts: 6799
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:55 pm

Re: Sotapanna and five precepts

Post by santa100 »

AN 9.12 seems to confirm it:
...Again, Sariputta, consider the person who is accomplished in the precepts, and is moderately successful in concentration, moderately successful in wisdom-by destroying the three fetters, he becomes one, who will be reborn seven times at most...
SarathW
Posts: 21184
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: Sotapanna and five precepts

Post by SarathW »

"For the stream-enterer is called “perfected in the kinds of virtue”;
and likewise the once-returner. But the non-returner is called “perfected in concentration.”
And the Arahant is called “perfected in understanding”

Page:10
http://bps.lk/olib/bp/bp207h.pdf
:reading:
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
SarathW
Posts: 21184
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: Sotapanna and five precepts

Post by SarathW »

I found some info here:

For the eradication of the remaining seven Fetters a Sotàpanna
is reborn seven times at most. He gains implicit confidence
in the Buddha, the Dhamma, and the Saïgha. He
would not for any reason violate any of the five precepts.He is not subject to states of woe as he is destined for
Enlightenment.

:reading:
http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/abhidhamma.pdf
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
daverupa
Posts: 5980
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: Sotapanna and five precepts

Post by daverupa »

SarathW wrote:I found some info here:

For the eradication of the remaining seven Fetters a Sotàpanna
is reborn seven times at most. He gains implicit confidence
in the Buddha, the Dhamma, and the Saïgha. He
would not for any reason violate any of the five precepts.He is not subject to states of woe as he is destined for
Enlightenment.

:reading:
http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/abhidhamma.pdf
If we read MN 115, what a sotapanna cannot do looks a little different. They will always report a fault, but they are not immune to faults, even in terms of some of the five precepts.
  • "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.

    "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.

- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
SarathW
Posts: 21184
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: Sotapanna and five precepts

Post by SarathW »

Thanks Devarupa
I read the link. But I could not get what you said there.
Where does it mentioned about Sotapanna?
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
daverupa
Posts: 5980
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: Sotapanna and five precepts

Post by daverupa »

SarathW wrote:Where does it mentioned about Sotapanna?
Ananda, the bhikkhu knows, it is impossible, that one come to right view...
This passage refers to the stream-enterer.
  • "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.

    "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.

- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
SarathW
Posts: 21184
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: Sotapanna and five precepts

Post by SarathW »

Thanks
Your statement is supported here as well:

Page 42:

22. Eradication of the Akusala Cittas by the four
classes of Aryan disciples.
A Sotàpanna (Stream-Winner) eradicates the 1st,
2nd, 5th, 6th, and 11th types of consciousness as he has
destroyed the two Fetters (Saüyojana)—Sakkàyadiññhi
(Self-illusion) and Vicikicchà (Doubts).
A Sakadàgàmi (Once-Returner), who has attained
the second stage of Sainthood, weakens the potentiality of
the 9th and 10th types of consciousness, because he has
only attenuated the two Fetters—Kàmaràga (Sense-desire)
and Pañigha (Hatred).
An Anàgàmi (Never-Returner), who has attained the
third stage of Sainthood, eradicates the above two types of consciousness
as he has completely destroyed the said two Fetters.

http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/abhidhamma.pdf
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
Post Reply