If you are going to quote quote the full thing! not some out of context word.daverupa wrote:I fail to see the problem you see; can you phrase it in another way?kirk5a wrote:Then what is your explanation for why Ven. Sariputta speaks of...
Cittasanto wrote:retarded
SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
- Cittasanto
- Posts: 6646
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
- Location: Ellan Vannin
- Contact:
Re: SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
- Spiny O'Norman
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:46 am
- Location: Suffolk, England
Re: SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
DO explains that birth arises in dependence on being / becoming in the 3 realms ( see extract below ). It doesn't matter whether one thinks of this as a current birth or future birth.daverupa wrote: Indeed, I can't get behind the claim that jati must refer to one's future birth
Paticca-samuppada-vibhanga Sutta: Analysis of Dependent Co-arising translated from the Pali by Thanissaro Bhikkhu
"From becoming as a requisite condition comes birth. From birth as a requisite condition, then aging & death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, distress, & despair come into play. Such is the origination of this entire mass of stress & suffering.
- Spiny O'Norman
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:46 am
- Location: Suffolk, England
Re: SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
But DO is describing samsara for a putthujjana, not an arahant. The putthujjana experiences the physical dart as dukkha, the arahant does not.daverupa wrote:The bodily dart is never attenuated in life as both the putthujjana and the arahat feel that dart. Paticcasamuppada/-nirodha is not to do with that physical dart at all.
So DO is describing how both the physical and mental darts create dukkha for a putthujjana - this is why descriptions of dukkha in the suttas include aging, disease and death, pain etc.
Spiny
Re: SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
The physical dart remains unchanged in both cases, yet the mental dart is removed in the case of the arahat; dukkha is removed in the case of the arahat. There can be no dukkha in the physical dart, it is rather the mind which is defiled by incoming defilements - dukkha exists, but as a mental phenomenon. It is not inherent in physicality.Spiny O'Norman wrote:But DO is describing samsara for a putthujjana, not an arahant. The putthujjana experiences the physical dart as dukkha, the arahant does not.
So DO is describing how both the physical and mental darts create dukkha for a putthujjana - this is why descriptions of dukkha in the suttas include aging, disease and death, pain etc.
Spiny
This is why I said that the bodily dart is never attenuated in life:
---"But in the case of a well-taught noble disciple, O monks, when he is touched by a painful feeling, he will not worry nor grieve and lament, he will not beat his breast and weep, nor will he be distraught. It is one kind of feeling he experiences, a bodily one, but not a mental feeling. It is as if a man were pierced by a dart, but was not hit by a second dart following the first one.
Yet it's neither; it's symptomatic of the appropriation of this very lifespan, now, as "mine". Whether one thinks that "this life is the only one I have", or whether one thinks "I will have multiple lives (unless...)", the appropriation is the problem, not the speculative content.Spiny O'Norman wrote:It doesn't matter whether one thinks of this as a current birth or future birth.
- "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.
"And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.
- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
- Spiny O'Norman
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:46 am
- Location: Suffolk, England
Re: SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
But the Maha-satipatthana Sutta makes it clear that dukkha includes both bodily and mental pain, ie both darts - see the extract below. And being pierced by any type of dart sounds painful.daverupa wrote:The physical dart remains unchanged in both cases, yet the mental dart is removed in the case of the arahat; dukkha is removed in the case of the arahat. There can be no dukkha in the physical dart, it is rather the mind which is defiled by incoming defilements - dukkha exists, but as a mental phenomenon. It is not inherent in physicality.
387. Bhikkhus, what is the Noble Truth of Dukkha'?
Birth is dukkha. Aging also is dukkha. Death also is dukkha. Grief, lamentation, pain, distress, and despair are also dukkha. To have to associate with those persons or things one dislikes is also dukkha; to be separated from those one loves or likes is also dukkha; the craving for what one cannot get is also dukkha; in short, the five Aggregates which are the objects of Clinging are dukkha.
393. And, bhikkhus, what is pain? The bodily pain and bodily unpleasantness, the painful and unpleasant feeling produced by contact of the body, — this, bhikkhus, is called pain.
394. And, bhikkhus, what is distress? The mental pain and mental unpleasantness, the painful and unpleasant feeling produced by contact of the mind, — this, bhikkhus, is called distress.
Last edited by Spiny O'Norman on Wed Feb 29, 2012 2:47 pm, edited 4 times in total.
- Spiny O'Norman
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:46 am
- Location: Suffolk, England
Re: SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
Doesn't this quote support what I'm saying? There is the dukkha of a painful bodily feeling ( first dart ) but not the dukkha of a painful mental feeling arising from it ( second dart )?daverupa wrote:"But in the case of a well-taught noble disciple, O monks, when he is touched by a painful feeling, he will not worry nor grieve and lament, he will not beat his breast and weep, nor will he be distraught. It is one kind of feeling he experiences, a bodily one, but not a mental feeling. It is as if a man were pierced by a dart, but was not hit by a second dart following the first one.
Spiny
Re: SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
This is from the Visuddhimagga section that Mike quoted earlier:
"Whatever phenomena which arise from cause," obviously includes whatever is physical.
The following brief summary is what awakened both Sariputta and Moggallana.So would a bhikkhu overcome
His doubts, then ever mindfully
Let him discern conditions both
Of mind and matter thoroughly.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Whatever phenomena arise from cause:
their cause
& their cessation.
Such is the teaching of the Tathagata,
the Great Contemplative.
"Whatever phenomena which arise from cause," obviously includes whatever is physical.
"When one thing is practiced & pursued, ignorance is abandoned, clear knowing arises, the conceit 'I am' is abandoned, latent tendencies are uprooted, fetters are abandoned. Which one thing? Mindfulness immersed in the body." -AN 1.230
Re: SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
kirk5a wrote:This is from the Visuddhimagga...
As to that, I will ask you a question; answer as you see fit.Spiny O'Norman wrote:Doesn't this quote support what I'm saying? There is the dukkha of a painful bodily feeling ( first dart ) but not the dukkha of a painful mental feeling arising from it ( second dart )?
Spiny
Was the Buddha experiencing dukkha, here?DN 16 wrote:But when the Blessed One had entered upon the rainy season, there arose in him a severe illness, and sharp and deadly pains came upon him. And the Blessed One endured them mindfully, clearly comprehending and unperturbed.
- "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.
"And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.
- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
Re: SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
Of course. Pain does not magically stop being dukkha just because one endures it mindfully, clearly comprehending and unperturbed. It's just that there is no additional mental dukkha (which is a major factor of the overall dukkha-ness). That's the whole point of the Arrow Sutta.daverupa wrote:Was the Buddha experiencing dukkha, here?DN 16 wrote:But when the Blessed One had entered upon the rainy season, there arose in him a severe illness, and sharp and deadly pains came upon him. And the Blessed One endured them mindfully, clearly comprehending and unperturbed.
"When one thing is practiced & pursued, ignorance is abandoned, clear knowing arises, the conceit 'I am' is abandoned, latent tendencies are uprooted, fetters are abandoned. Which one thing? Mindfulness immersed in the body." -AN 1.230
Re: SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
Sure it does - though not magically but rather dependently. The Arrow Sutta is exemplifying the difference between pain and dukkha.kirk5a wrote:Pain does not magically stop being dukkha just because one endures it mindfully, clearly comprehending and unperturbed.
There is diversity in dukkha; but the claim that the cessation of dukkha per the Path applies to only some sorts of dukkha is nowhere in evidence; quite the contrary, paticcasamuppada describes the origin of dukkha, not the origin of some dukkha; paticcanirodha describes the cessation of dukkha, not the cessation of some dukkha.AN 6.63 wrote:And what is the diversity in stress? There is major stress & minor, slowly fading & quickly fading. This is called the diversity in stress...
...Now when a disciple of the noble ones discerns stress in this way, the cause by which stress comes into play in this way, the diversity of stress in this way, the result of stress in this way, the cessation of stress in this way, & the path of practice leading to the cessation of stress in this way, then he discerns this penetrative holy life as the cessation of stress.
- "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.
"And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.
- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
Re: SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
Right. Nobody is claiming that, so no problem.daverupa wrote: There is diversity in dukkha; but the claim that the cessation of dukkha per the Path applies to only some sorts of dukkha is nowhere in evidence;
I agree. But the total cessation of dukkha is not at the point the Arrow Sutta describes, when there is still pain. That is the "nibbana property with fuel remaining." The total cessation is after those aggregates cease altogether, not to arise again. "Nibbana property with no fuel remaining."quite the contrary, paticcasamuppada describes the origin of dukkha, not the origin of some dukkha; paticcanirodha describes the cessation of dukkha, not the cessation of some dukkha.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... ml#iti-044" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;And what is the Unbinding property with fuel remaining? There is the case where a monk is an arahant whose fermentations have ended, who has reached fulfillment, finished the task, laid down the burden, attained the true goal, ended the fetter of becoming, and is released through right gnosis. His five sense faculties still remain and, owing to their being intact, he is cognizant of the agreeable & the disagreeable, and is sensitive to pleasure & pain. His ending of passion, aversion, & delusion is termed the Unbinding property with fuel remaining.[1]
And what is the Unbinding property with no fuel remaining? There is the case where a monk is an arahant whose fermentations have ended, who has reached fulfillment, finished the task, laid down the burden, attained the true goal, ended the fetter of becoming, and is released through right gnosis. For him, all that is sensed, being unrelished, will grow cold right here. This is termed the Unbinding property with no fuel remaining."[2]
These two proclaimed
by the one with vision,
Unbinding properties the one independent,
the one who is Such:[3]
one property, here in this life
with fuel remaining
from the destruction
of the guide to becoming,
and that with no fuel remaining,
after this life,
in which all becoming
totally ceases.
"When one thing is practiced & pursued, ignorance is abandoned, clear knowing arises, the conceit 'I am' is abandoned, latent tendencies are uprooted, fetters are abandoned. Which one thing? Mindfulness immersed in the body." -AN 1.230
Re: SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
Sensations of pleasure and pain are part of nibbana with residue, but such a one senses them disjoined, and they are not dukkha.MN 140 wrote:"Sensing a feeling of pleasure, one discerns that it is fleeting, not grasped at, not relished. Sensing a feeling of pain... Sensing a feeling of neither pleasure nor pain, one discerns that it is fleeting, not grasped at, not relished. Sensing a feeling of pleasure, one senses it disjoined from it. Sensing a feeling of pain... Sensing a feeling of neither pleasure nor pain, one senses it disjoined from it. When sensing a feeling limited to the body, one discerns that 'I am sensing a feeling limited to the body.' When sensing a feeling limited to life, one discerns that 'I am sensing a feeling limited to life.' One discerns that 'With the break-up of the body, after the termination of life, all that is sensed, not being relished, will grow cold right here.'
I suppose we'll simply continue to disagree on this point, so I'll depart the discussion on that note.
- "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.
"And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.
- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 27854
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
Greetings,
Apologies that I cannot recall the source, but I have read the opinion that dukkha-dukkha (suffering of suffering), viparinama-dukkha (suffering due to change) and sankhara-dukkha (suffering due to formations) are not to be regarded different sets/subsets of suffering, but rather, progressively more refined understandings of dukkha. Whoever said it (possibly Thanissaro Bhikkhu?), I'm inclined to agree.
The latter of those three appears to be the most suitable understanding to bring to suttas such as the one presently being studied, particularly as it is concerned with formations that arise dependently upon requisite conditions.
Metta,
Retro.
Apologies that I cannot recall the source, but I have read the opinion that dukkha-dukkha (suffering of suffering), viparinama-dukkha (suffering due to change) and sankhara-dukkha (suffering due to formations) are not to be regarded different sets/subsets of suffering, but rather, progressively more refined understandings of dukkha. Whoever said it (possibly Thanissaro Bhikkhu?), I'm inclined to agree.
The latter of those three appears to be the most suitable understanding to bring to suttas such as the one presently being studied, particularly as it is concerned with formations that arise dependently upon requisite conditions.
Metta,
Retro.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
- Spiny O'Norman
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:46 am
- Location: Suffolk, England
Re: SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
I don't know. As I said the Maha-sattipatthana Sutta includes bodily pain in the "definition" of dukkha.daverupa wrote:As to that, I will ask you a question; answer as you see fit.Spiny O'Norman wrote:Doesn't this quote support what I'm saying? There is the dukkha of a painful bodily feeling ( first dart ) but not the dukkha of a painful mental feeling arising from it ( second dart )?
Spiny
Was the Buddha experiencing dukkha, here?DN 16 wrote:But when the Blessed One had entered upon the rainy season, there arose in him a severe illness, and sharp and deadly pains came upon him. And the Blessed One endured them mindfully, clearly comprehending and unperturbed.
Spiny
- Spiny O'Norman
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:46 am
- Location: Suffolk, England
Re: SN 12.20 Paccaya Sutta: Requisite Conditions
I don't find this argument convincing, because being shot with arrows of any sort is painful. The Arrow Sutta is simply saying that a well-instructed disciple experiences the physical pain ( first arrow ) but not the associated mental pain ( second arrow ).daverupa wrote: The Arrow Sutta is exemplifying the difference between pain and dukkha..
Spiny