Give me that good old time genitive religion.Paññāsikhara wrote:
Further permutations can be made through, say, genitive relationships, ie. the suffering of volitional formations. Perhaps then the solution would be one of dissociation, ending the possessive relationship rather than the thing itself.
~~ Huifeng
Saṅkhāradukkhatā - Suffering due to Volitional Formations
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: Saṅkhāradukkhatā - Suffering due to Volitional Formations
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
Re: Saṅkhāradukkhatā - Suffering due to Volitional Formations
Hi,
Thanks for more thoughts on that point. Now, do you think that there are hints in other parts of Canon which might suggest which interpretation should be prefered? I also wonder if different schools had different views on that issue. That would be interesting to know.Paññāsikhara wrote:Well, for example (...)
Bhagavaṃmūlakā no, bhante, dhammā...