Some, maybe.reflection wrote:Yes, but we have to admit it's a very brave thing to say you've been doing it wrong for 20 years. The Ven. already deserves some respect just because of that.
Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
I only ever read what he has to say on the subject briefly, but I would agree with Mike's assessment.retrofuturist wrote:Out of interest, what do you make of Venerable Vimalaramsi's understanding of jhana?
All the best,
Geoff
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 27858
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
Thanks Mike & Geoff.
Metta,
Retro.
Metta,
Retro.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
Hello:
I dont know many teachers, but i found this one and his meditation instructions sound coherent.
Thats why i would love to know the opinion of someone who doesnt agree with his technique...
just his technique, not what he talks about history or any other subject.
What to you think specially on this two definitions that he uses, and in your opinion, why this isnt coherent ?:
1)Mindfulness- (Sati) "The act of remembering to recognize and release any distraction that pulls mind’s attention away from the object of meditation ALL THE TIME; remembering to observe the movements of mind’s attention moment-to-moment ALL THE TIME."
2)calming the bodily formation: "relaxing tension of body and breath".
Much Metta.
I dont know many teachers, but i found this one and his meditation instructions sound coherent.
Thats why i would love to know the opinion of someone who doesnt agree with his technique...
just his technique, not what he talks about history or any other subject.
What to you think specially on this two definitions that he uses, and in your opinion, why this isnt coherent ?:
1)Mindfulness- (Sati) "The act of remembering to recognize and release any distraction that pulls mind’s attention away from the object of meditation ALL THE TIME; remembering to observe the movements of mind’s attention moment-to-moment ALL THE TIME."
2)calming the bodily formation: "relaxing tension of body and breath".
Much Metta.
Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
Hi 2600htz,
Yes, that's a key part of Ven Vimalaramsi's instructions:
http://www.dhammasukha.org/Study/study.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
As I though I said earlier in the thread, I think his instructions are good. His discussion of dealing with the hindrances seems very effective (though, as I have said, not particularly different from others). I listened to a number of his talks a few years ago and found them beneficial. Some would use a different definition for sati, but as a practical instruction, what he says seems fine to me. The (Mahasi) instructions I use are also to pay attention to those things all the time (or as much as possible...).
Where different teachers might have slight disagreements is in the "release" instructions, though my teachers do sometimes recommend some active relaxation of something that is particularly troublesome.
Mike
Yes, that's a key part of Ven Vimalaramsi's instructions:
http://www.dhammasukha.org/Study/study.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
As I though I said earlier in the thread, I think his instructions are good. His discussion of dealing with the hindrances seems very effective (though, as I have said, not particularly different from others). I listened to a number of his talks a few years ago and found them beneficial. Some would use a different definition for sati, but as a practical instruction, what he says seems fine to me. The (Mahasi) instructions I use are also to pay attention to those things all the time (or as much as possible...).
Where different teachers might have slight disagreements is in the "release" instructions, though my teachers do sometimes recommend some active relaxation of something that is particularly troublesome.
Mike
Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
Related to Ven V's instructions, It happens that I've been listening to this talk today:
Mike
- Ajahn Amaro
2010-05-04 Becoming - why public speaking is more terrifying than worldwide nuclear destruction 67:52
http://www.dharmaseed.org/teacher/4/?se ... c+speaking" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Mike
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
As i said, this nothing new, nor is it unique to Vimalaramsi'. i first heard this sort of instruction in the 70's from Mahasi Sayadaw trained teacher.mikenz66 wrote:Related to Ven V's instructions, It happens that I've been listening to this talk today:
At around 27:00 there is a discussion on dealing with things by relaxing the bodily tension. And at 36:50 he mentions smiling as a technique.
- Ajahn Amaro
2010-05-04 Becoming - why public speaking is more terrifying than worldwide nuclear destruction 67:52
http://www.dharmaseed.org/teacher/4/?se ... c+speaking" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Mike
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:46 am
Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
Bhante V's meditation and sutta teachings are quite sound. When I started out my understanding of Buddhism was confusing when I thought it was good. When asked questions I found I could not explain things well and often ran into conundrums. Following Bhante V's method and vocabulary definitions has helped me tremendously in linking suttas to meditation and bringing a new found confidence in my understanding. So as a Buddhist teacher he is really quite good despite his quirky personality.
The commentaries which most people start off with push us in a direction that is farther off than translations of suttas. The suttas are the closest thing we have to confirming that our practice is good and true. There are many different "enlightenments" out there that sure do feel good and liberating but the Buddhist goal is total and complete Awakening which the Buddha alone has laid before us (in the suttas). When you have a good confident understanding of the suttas (by knowing and practicing) and how they inter-relate then you can start reading commentaries as a helpful resource. Otherwise you will be left with a dim candle in a house of mirrors.
The commentaries which most people start off with push us in a direction that is farther off than translations of suttas. The suttas are the closest thing we have to confirming that our practice is good and true. There are many different "enlightenments" out there that sure do feel good and liberating but the Buddhist goal is total and complete Awakening which the Buddha alone has laid before us (in the suttas). When you have a good confident understanding of the suttas (by knowing and practicing) and how they inter-relate then you can start reading commentaries as a helpful resource. Otherwise you will be left with a dim candle in a house of mirrors.
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
And Vimalaramsi' alone has it right and all those others are just mindlessly pushing the commentaries and have no clue as to what the suttas say? Is that what you are saying?thelotuseffect wrote:The commentaries which most people start off with push us in a direction that is farther off than translations of suttas.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 27858
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
... and welcome to the forum.
Metta,
Retro.
Metta,
Retro.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:46 am
Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
tiltbillings wrote:And Vimalaramsi' alone has it right and all those others are just mindlessly pushing the commentaries and have no clue as to what the suttas say? Is that what you are saying?thelotuseffect wrote:The commentaries which most people start off with push us in a direction that is farther off than translations of suttas.
Hahaaha, no. I'm sure there are others.
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
Have you read through this thread, looked at the links to the other discussions of Vimalaramsi?thelotuseffect wrote:tiltbillings wrote:And Vimalaramsi' alone has it right and all those others are just mindlessly pushing the commentaries and have no clue as to what the suttas say? Is that what you are saying?thelotuseffect wrote:The commentaries which most people start off with push us in a direction that is farther off than translations of suttas.
Hahaaha, no. I'm sure there are others.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
I get an odd feeling from watching this video. He seems to be pretending.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:46 am
Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
No, but having done a retreat with the Venerable I can say it was a helpful experience for me. I do admit he has a bit of an odd character and says things I do not always agree with but his teachings on the suttas and about meditation are the best I've received so far.
Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries
Thanks for reviving my thread.
I originally started the thread because I was intrigued by the video and was wondering how the rubber met the road with his teachings. Instead I got a lot of people posting factionalist gripes. I understand why they are offended, but I was curious about the results of that meditation, not the other stuff. You gave what I wanted, some feedback about the method from someone who used it. Thank you.
I originally started the thread because I was intrigued by the video and was wondering how the rubber met the road with his teachings. Instead I got a lot of people posting factionalist gripes. I understand why they are offended, but I was curious about the results of that meditation, not the other stuff. You gave what I wanted, some feedback about the method from someone who used it. Thank you.
In reading the scriptures, there are two kinds of mistakes:
One mistake is to cling to the literal text and miss the inner principles.
The second mistake is to recognize the principles but not apply them to your own mind, so that you waste time and just make them into causes of entanglement.
One mistake is to cling to the literal text and miss the inner principles.
The second mistake is to recognize the principles but not apply them to your own mind, so that you waste time and just make them into causes of entanglement.