Hi, I found this here, it mentions that while the breath meditation is discussed 8 times in the Suttas, Metta is discussed more than one hundred times, is this an indication of a preference towards one of the methods?
smile all the time
dhammarelax
Metta vs. Breath
-
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:59 pm
Metta vs. Breath
Even if the flesh & blood in my body dry up, leaving just the skin, tendons, & bones, I will use all my human firmness, human persistence and human striving. There will be no relaxing my persistence until I am the first of my generation to attain full awakening in this lifetime. ed. AN 2.5
Re: Metta vs. Breath
Does meditation have to be either one or the other? Why not both?
- badscooter
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:07 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Metta vs. Breath
I do not consider vimalaramsi to be a reliable or trust worthy source.
I believe the Buddha taught many different kinds of meditation all dependent on who he was teaching to..
I believe the themes he taught to keep in mind for mindfulness meditation are the four satipatthana.
I believe anyone teaching a "secret technique" that which is said to be the only "true" technique of the Buddha is a snake oil salesman.
Maha metta
I believe the Buddha taught many different kinds of meditation all dependent on who he was teaching to..
I believe the themes he taught to keep in mind for mindfulness meditation are the four satipatthana.
I believe anyone teaching a "secret technique" that which is said to be the only "true" technique of the Buddha is a snake oil salesman.
Maha metta
"whatever one frequently thinks and ponders upon will be the inclination of one's mind"
-
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:59 pm
Re: Metta vs. Breath
Why do you think Bhante Vimalramsi is not a reliable source?badscooter wrote:I do not consider vimalaramsi to be a reliable or trust worthy source.
I believe the Buddha taught many different kinds of meditation all dependent on who he was teaching to..
I believe the themes he taught to keep in mind for mindfulness meditation are the four satipatthana.
I believe anyone teaching a "secret technique" that which is said to be the only "true" technique of the Buddha is a snake oil salesman.
Maha metta
Even if the flesh & blood in my body dry up, leaving just the skin, tendons, & bones, I will use all my human firmness, human persistence and human striving. There will be no relaxing my persistence until I am the first of my generation to attain full awakening in this lifetime. ed. AN 2.5
-
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:59 pm
Re: Metta vs. Breath
My experience is that you are better off dedicating yourself to master one method.waterchan wrote:Does meditation have to be either one or the other? Why not both?
Even if the flesh & blood in my body dry up, leaving just the skin, tendons, & bones, I will use all my human firmness, human persistence and human striving. There will be no relaxing my persistence until I am the first of my generation to attain full awakening in this lifetime. ed. AN 2.5
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: Metta vs. Breath
This thread and this thread may give some idea as to why Vimalaramsi may be seen as being problematic by some.dhammarelax wrote:Why do you think Bhante Vimalramsi is not a reliable source?badscooter wrote:I do not consider vimalaramsi to be a reliable or trust worthy source.
I believe the Buddha taught many different kinds of meditation all dependent on who he was teaching to..
I believe the themes he taught to keep in mind for mindfulness meditation are the four satipatthana.
I believe anyone teaching a "secret technique" that which is said to be the only "true" technique of the Buddha is a snake oil salesman.
Maha metta
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
- badscooter
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:07 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Metta vs. Breath
Well tilt just gave two threads to look at. I go off of the personal conversations I've had with him and his senior students. The constant response to all legitimate questions that they could not answer would be "just try the method for yourself and see if it works". This was after a bunch of back and forth about the suttas and evidence found there in..dhammarelax wrote:Why do you think Bhante Vimalramsi is not a reliable source?badscooter wrote:I do not consider vimalaramsi to be a reliable or trust worthy source.
I believe the Buddha taught many different kinds of meditation all dependent on who he was teaching to..
I believe the themes he taught to keep in mind for mindfulness meditation are the four satipatthana.
I believe anyone teaching a "secret technique" that which is said to be the only "true" technique of the Buddha is a snake oil salesman.
Maha metta
That kinda showed me how he/they are sneaky and hypocritical. They don't want me to pass judgement on their practice until I try it, however, they have no problem passing judgement on all other practices.. And I know for a fact that they haven't tried all of them because they told me.
They like to say that "all other" practices are all wrong except his method. He told me to try for myself to decide. It's a shame he didn't take his own advise...
Apparently there are a slew of stream enters and once returners that vimalaramsi has labeled over there. It seems to me people in that practice are being taught to dramatically over estimate their attainments. From the discussions I've had with them a lot of what they consider attainments seem to come from what is known as wrong concentration practices.
When trying his method it was almost the exact same method I had done with a Tibetan Rinpoche many years ago. Nothing new...
I prefer more scholarly monks like Venerable Analayo.
Maha metta
"whatever one frequently thinks and ponders upon will be the inclination of one's mind"
-
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:59 pm
Re: Metta vs. Breath
Did you get any results from his method?badscooter wrote:Well tilt just gave two threads to look at. I go off of the personal conversations I've had with him and his senior students. The constant response to all legitimate questions that they could not answer would be "just try the method for yourself and see if it works". This was after a bunch of back and forth about the suttas and evidence found there in..dhammarelax wrote:Why do you think Bhante Vimalramsi is not a reliable source?badscooter wrote:I do not consider vimalaramsi to be a reliable or trust worthy source.
I believe the Buddha taught many different kinds of meditation all dependent on who he was teaching to..
I believe the themes he taught to keep in mind for mindfulness meditation are the four satipatthana.
I believe anyone teaching a "secret technique" that which is said to be the only "true" technique of the Buddha is a snake oil salesman.
Maha metta
That kinda showed me how he/they are sneaky and hypocritical. They don't want me to pass judgement on their practice until I try it, however, they have no problem passing judgement on all other practices.. And I know for a fact that they haven't tried all of them because they told me.
They like to say that "all other" practices are all wrong except his method. He told me to try for myself to decide. It's a shame he didn't take his own advise...
Apparently there are a slew of stream enters and once returners that vimalaramsi has labeled over there. It seems to me people in that practice are being taught to dramatically over estimate their attainments. From the discussions I've had with them a lot of what they consider attainments seem to come from what is known as wrong concentration practices.
When trying his method it was almost the exact same method I had done with a Tibetan Rinpoche many years ago. Nothing new...
I prefer more scholarly monks like Venerable Analayo.
Maha metta
Even if the flesh & blood in my body dry up, leaving just the skin, tendons, & bones, I will use all my human firmness, human persistence and human striving. There will be no relaxing my persistence until I am the first of my generation to attain full awakening in this lifetime. ed. AN 2.5
- tsurezuregusa
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 8:04 pm
- Location: Munich, Germany
Re: Metta vs. Breath
Did you actually do the work yourself and counted how many times the breath meditation is mentioned or are you just going by hearsay? Did you know that the Buddha indicated that Metta bhavana leads to the Brahma heavens only unless you put in some Satipatthana vipassana practice. Why then not go directly and practice Satipatthana.dhammarelax wrote:Hi, I found this here, it mentions that while the breath meditation is discussed 8 times in the Suttas, Metta is discussed more than one hundred times, is this an indication of a preference towards one of the methods?
Additionally, Metta practice is recommended to overcome hatred. I would say that most people lean more towards sense desires than to hatred. Therefore some asubha bhavana might be a better way to go.
Kind regards,
Florian
Re: Metta vs. Breath
Hi Floriantsurezuregusa wrote:
Additionally, Metta practice is recommended to overcome hatred. I would say that most people lean more towards sense desires than to hatred. Therefore some asubha bhavana might be a better way to go.
Kind regards,
Florian
Is asubha bhavana a suitable practice for lay people? Many people suffer from self loathing as well as sense desires, would this make asubha bhavana inappropriate? My personal view is that asubha bhavana may not be appropriate without some hands on guidance and within the right setting, unless one has a very strong grounding in Dhamma.
-
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:59 pm
Re: Metta vs. Breath
Nope I didnt count.tsurezuregusa wrote:Did you actually do the work yourself and counted how many times the breath meditation is mentioned or are you just going by hearsay? Did you know that the Buddha indicated that Metta bhavana leads to the Brahma heavens only unless you put in some Satipatthana vipassana practice. Why then not go directly and practice Satipatthana.dhammarelax wrote:Hi, I found this here, it mentions that while the breath meditation is discussed 8 times in the Suttas, Metta is discussed more than one hundred times, is this an indication of a preference towards one of the methods?
Additionally, Metta practice is recommended to overcome hatred. I would say that most people lean more towards sense desires than to hatred. Therefore some asubha bhavana might be a better way to go.
Kind regards,
Florian
Even if the flesh & blood in my body dry up, leaving just the skin, tendons, & bones, I will use all my human firmness, human persistence and human striving. There will be no relaxing my persistence until I am the first of my generation to attain full awakening in this lifetime. ed. AN 2.5
- badscooter
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:07 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Metta vs. Breath
The Tibetan monk? sure...dhammarelax wrote:Did you get any results from his method?badscooter wrote:Well tilt just gave two threads to look at. I go off of the personal conversations I've had with him and his senior students. The constant response to all legitimate questions that they could not answer would be "just try the method for yourself and see if it works". This was after a bunch of back and forth about the suttas and evidence found there in..
That kinda showed me how he/they are sneaky and hypocritical. They don't want me to pass judgement on their practice until I try it, however, they have no problem passing judgement on all other practices.. And I know for a fact that they haven't tried all of them because they told me.
They like to say that "all other" practices are all wrong except his method. He told me to try for myself to decide. It's a shame he didn't take his own advise...
Apparently there are a slew of stream enters and once returners that vimalaramsi has labeled over there. It seems to me people in that practice are being taught to dramatically over estimate their attainments. From the discussions I've had with them a lot of what they consider attainments seem to come from what is known as wrong concentration practices.
When trying his method it was almost the exact same method I had done with a Tibetan Rinpoche many years ago. Nothing new...
I prefer more scholarly monks like Venerable Analayo.
Maha metta
although one didn't just stick with metta only. meditation objects could and would change, sometimes in the same sitting (much like some vipassana schools) however they called the practice more calm abiding rather than insight. Usually though one would use any object that was available. There was sound meditation, breath meditation, meditation on the physical body sensations, metta meditation, tonglen meditation, objectless meditation (relaxing in present moment), meditation on form, meditation on smell, meditation on thoughts and meditating on feelings.
maha metta
"whatever one frequently thinks and ponders upon will be the inclination of one's mind"
- tsurezuregusa
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 8:04 pm
- Location: Munich, Germany
Re: Metta vs. Breath
Sometimes asubha meditation is limited to contemplation about the different types of decaying corpses. But it also includes the contemplation of the 32 body parts. And that is something most people I guess are familiar with from their high school biology classes. So that shouldn't cause any problems and I consider it a definitive suitable practice for lay people.Mr Man wrote:Hi Floriantsurezuregusa wrote:
Additionally, Metta practice is recommended to overcome hatred. I would say that most people lean more towards sense desires than to hatred. Therefore some asubha bhavana might be a better way to go.
Kind regards,
Florian
Is asubha bhavana a suitable practice for lay people? Many people suffer from self loathing as well as sense desires, would this make asubha bhavana inappropriate? My personal view is that asubha bhavana may not be appropriate without some hands on guidance and within the right setting, unless one has a very strong grounding in Dhamma.
I am not sure about self-loathing, is that a "normal state" like sensual desires or more like a psychological disorder?
Kind regards,
Florian
Re: Metta vs. Breath
The advice I've had from monastics, which I've found to be helpful, is that the first ("external")
pentad of the contemplation is usually effective enough to deal with sensual desire.
Mike
pentad of the contemplation is usually effective enough to deal with sensual desire.
‘In this body there are head-hairs, body-hairs, nails, teeth, skin, ...
https://suttacentral.net/en/mn10
Mike
Re: Metta vs. Breath
Dear Scooter,badscooter wrote:When trying [Vimalaramsi's] method it was almost the exact same method I had done with a Tibetan Rinpoche many years ago. Nothing new...
although one didn't just stick with metta only. meditation objects could and would change, sometimes in the same sitting (much like some vipassana schools) however they called the practice more calm abiding rather than insight. Usually though one would use any object that was available. There was sound meditation, breath meditation, meditation on the physical body sensations, metta meditation, tonglen meditation, objectless meditation (relaxing in present moment), meditation on form, meditation on smell, meditation on thoughts and meditating on feelings.
as far as I am acquainted with the Ven. Vimalaramsis method, switching the meditation object to "any object that [is] available" is one thing he stresses one should not do.
Best Wishes
Last edited by mirco on Thu Jul 16, 2015 11:22 am, edited 1 time in total.