Page 5 of 7

Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:23 am
by alan
It's just so simple-minded. I'm looking for a teacher who is smarter than me. He does not qualify.

Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:25 am
by thelotuseffect
lol so its different than what that teacher teaches.

Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:27 am
by tiltbillings
thelotuseffect wrote:lol so its different than what that teacher teaches.
How so?

Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:29 am
by thelotuseffect
thelotuseffect wrote:Well Vipassana notes all arising and passing away phenomena. Noting all phenomena is not a step in Bhante V's method. The only noticing occurs during the event of a hindrance and then purifying that before coming back to your meditation object.
This is becoming trite and obtuse.

Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:31 am
by tiltbillings
thelotuseffect wrote:
thelotuseffect wrote:Well Vipassana notes all arising and passing away phenomena. Noting all phenomena is not a step in Bhante V's method. The only noticing occurs during the event of a hindrance and then purifying that before coming back to your meditation object.
This is becoming trite and obtuse.
So, following Vimalaramsi's method, what do you between noting the hindrances?

Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:36 am
by thelotuseffect
Stay on your object of meditation. Mine is generating metta. If no hindrance arises then chances are high that you are in a jhana.

Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:37 am
by tiltbillings
thelotuseffect wrote:Stay on your object of meditation. Mine is generating metta. If no hindrance arises then chances are high that you are in a jhana.
Metta practice will lead to arahanta? Where does insight into the three mark come to play in this practice?

Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:43 am
by thelotuseffect
Knowledge and vision are attainments achieved through practice. By learning how minds attention works through meditation one gains insight into Dependent Origination which is an impersonal process.

Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:45 am
by tiltbillings
thelotuseffect wrote:Knowledge and vision are attainments achieved through practice. By learning how minds attention works through meditation one gains insight into Dependent Origination which is an impersonal process.
So, how does this work doing metta practice?

Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:51 am
by mikenz66
tiltbillings wrote:
thelotuseffect wrote:Stay on your object of meditation. Mine is generating metta. If no hindrance arises then chances are high that you are in a jhana.
Metta practice will lead to arahanta? Where does insight into the three mark come to play in this practice?
I listened to a lot of Bhante V's talks back in 2007/2008 so perhaps I can have a go at answering this.

Bhante V's instructions use metta as the primary object (to use Mahasi terminology) for building concentration. When a hindrance arises one is aware of it, goes through the 6R process he describes, then goes back to the object (metta). The awareness of the hindrances is the vipassana aspect (the hindrances are anicca, dukkha, anatta, they arise via the DO sequence, etc, similar to how other teachers would teach it).

So, in broad terms, it's not that different from what many teachers teach, except that:
1. I have not come across other teachers using metta in quite this way, as a "primary object" in vipassana-oriented practice. Most other teachers use objects like breath, abdominal motion, motion of feet, etc for that.
2. The 6R thing is a different way of explaining how to get back to the primary object from the way other teachers explain it.

But I don't see any serious contradictions.

:anjali:
Mike

Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:57 am
by tiltbillings
mikenz66 wrote:
tiltbillings wrote:
thelotuseffect wrote:Stay on your object of meditation. Mine is generating metta. If no hindrance arises then chances are high that you are in a jhana.
Metta practice will lead to arahanta? Where does insight into the three mark come to play in this practice?
I listened to a lot of Bhante V's talks back in 2007/2008 so perhaps I can have a go at answering this.

Bhante V's instructions use metta as the primary object (to use Mahasi terminology) for building concentration. When a hindrance arises one is aware of it, goes through the 6R process he describes, then goes back to the object (metta). The awareness of the hindrances is the vipassana aspect (the hindrances are anicca, dukkha, anatta, they arise via the DO sequence, etc, similar to how other teachers would teach it).

So, in broad terms, it's not that different from what many teachers teach, except that:
1. I have not come across other teachers using metta in quite this way, as a "primary object" in vipassana-oriented practice. Most other teachers use objects like breath, abdominal motion, motion of feet, etc for that.
2. The 6R thing is a different way of explaining how to get back to the primary object from the way other teachers explain it.

But I don't see any serious contradictions.

:anjali:
Mike
Thanks. Basically, then, Vimalaramsi is teaching nothing really new.

Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:11 am
by mikenz66
tiltbillings wrote:Thanks. Basically, then, Vimalaramsi is teaching nothing really new.
That's my impression. If I ignore all his statements about other teachers, it seems to me that he has his own way of explaining how to examine experience that doesn't particularly disagree with what I've learned from others. But I've never seriously used his instructions, so I'm just going on what I've listened to.

:anjali:
Mike

Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:15 am
by tiltbillings
mikenz66 wrote:
tiltbillings wrote:Thanks. Basically, then, Vimalaramsi is teaching nothing really new.
That's my impression. If I ignore all his statements about other teachers, it seems to me that he has his own way of explaining how to examine experience that doesn't particularly disagree with what I've learned from others. But I've never seriously used his instructions, so I'm just going on what I've listened to.
Basically, then it is repackaged vipassana, still using "noting" -- developed by Mahasi Sayadaw -- as a primary tool. But from what has been presented in these videos it seems a bit fuzzy. Maybe the Vimalaramsi practice could be explained a more detail.

Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:29 am
by tiltbillings
As a supposed "Suttanta method" what is being presented here looks to be naught more than a variation of Burmese Vipassana.

Re: Video: Meditation: Suttas vs Commentaries

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:44 am
by mikenz66
Well, it is a little different, using metta as the primary object.

When I look in terms of general approach I see more similarities than differences between what I use and what most of the "vipassana" teachers teach (e.g. most of Ajahn Chah's students). I've had a couple of short retreats with Ajahn Tiradhammo (an Ajahn Chah student), which again isn't so different from Mahasi (though he doesn't use noting, there's still that primary/secondary object thing). He did say, though that the most useful meditation book he found was The Heart of Buddhist Meditation by Ven Nyanaponika...

:anjali:
Mike