Chakras

[daverupa]

For a modern approach which sees a Western empiricist practicing Chinese exercises and seeing Hindu gods, try reading Path Notes.
(It takes me back about 15 years; these are some old neurons firing to call up these titles; the single tattoo I have is related to Path Notes adventures...)

Sensei Glenn Morris R.I.P.

April 1st, no less! What a joker.

[marc108]

this is particular area of interest from me. I came from a Yogic background to Buddhism and noticed a lot of similarities but that the teachings on the chakras were missing... my personal opinion is that the Buddha was concerned primarily with liberation and teaching on & manipulation of the chakras isn't part of that path necessarily.

the chakras are part of the body, and should be treated as such re: mindfulness of the body. worrying about you or anything else effecting your chakras is about as useful as worrying about catching a cold. the conscious control of an untrained person over their energy system is about as much as over your heart... nearly nothing. the idea that you may have opened, or unbalanced a chakra is strictly a product of new age bastardization & isnt (to my knowledge) found in the traditional teachings.

that being said I've found the practices extremely useful in general, as well as with my current practice. Yoga & Qigong are the most refined, and imo best, systems to study if you can find a legitimate teacher (which is hard). There are Buddhist teachers as well who teach about somatic energies and their usage, re: Thanissaro Bhikkhu, Ajahn Lee Dhammadharo, & Ajahn Succito They have, again imo, a much more practical and useful teaching on the subject than you will find otherwise.

Worrying that a thought may or negative feeling will 'infect' you is pointless. Intrusive or negative thoughts, in my experience, are much more effectively dealt with the methods taught in MN20 Vitakkasanthana Sutta: http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ... el021.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.

[Tom]

Thank You all for your responses. I think I should clarify what I meant by my "negative thought". I really hope I'm not being confusing here, because this is something that's seriously been worrying me, and I would greatly appreciate advice: I meant that when I was doing the visualizations (and by visualization, I don't mean that I was simply thinking about my body from an outside perspective and imagining white light being released, it was more as if I was making an internal visualization and focusing my awareness on the area I was working with), focusing on the feeling of releasing/relaxing a certain chakra area, and trying to visualize and "feel" white light being released and radiating out from that area, I had a sudden worry (pretty superstitious) that what if some demonic entity entered the chakra and possessed me, and I then had an intrusive visualization of "black energy" or "demons" or "pentagrams" being absorbed in that area, and an intrusive thought of the sentence "A demon is possessing me" or "I am possessed". My reaction to this was to tighten the area because I was worried I was letting this "negative energy" in and giving it potential to manifest, and to then attempt to relax the area again and counter it with the white light visualization, although the intrusive thoughts/visualizations kept getting in the way, so I never felt as if it was satisfactorily "countered" or that the potential for the intrusive thought's/visualization's to manifest or affect my life was ever completely erased. This is what I meant by a "negative thought" worrying me. In this case would it actually be something to worry about, or should I still follow the advice you all are giving? Should I actually try and hold the white light visualization (without any intrusive thoughts/visualizations) until I feel satisfied? (which hasn't really worked because the intrusive thoughts always get in the way) Or should I just let go of this whole "counter" visualization idea? I really hope I haven't negatively affected my life in some way because of this, aside from the anxiety it's created.

[DAWN]

Negative energy is created by your own mind.

If your sila (morality) is good, you will be never experiance such kind of negativity. Develop your sila, do good things.

[danieLion]

If you are interested in chakras, you are going to become distracted from the Dhamma, but to each their own.

So, is your official position that the Dhamma and chakras are mutually exclusive?

[daverupa]

If you are interested in chakras, you are going to become distracted from the Dhamma, but to each their own.

So, is your official position that the Dhamma and chakras are mutually exclusive?

At least inasmuch as any two fields of knowledge cannot be pursued to the extent that one of them could be, if favored with time and energy. The Dhamma isn't necessarily easy - mental real estate is at a premium... dhammas proliferate with ease...

In any event, we are advised to calm kaya-sankhara, not multiply them and do esoteric maths.

[Nyana]

To really dive into this stuff in a Buddhist context (and to get up to your eyes in mummy dust and crazy ideas), have a look at The Bodhisattva Warriors: The Origin, Inner Philosophy, History and Symbolism of the Buddhist Martial Art Within India and China.

For a modern approach which sees a Western empiricist practicing Chinese exercises and seeing Hindu gods, try reading Path Notes.

Not very authoritative or comprehensive sources. Little wonder your knowledge of the subject revolves around "mummy dust and crazy ideas."

[Raksha]

It's true that Terry Dukes has no academic credibility. For an authoritative version of the same subject:
Stewart McFarlane, ‘Fighting Bodhisattvas and Inner Warriors: Buddhism and the Martial Traditions of China and Japan’ The Buddhist Forum, Vol. 3, 1994.
As for the late Dr. Glenn Morris, in his own field he was both comprehensive and authoritative. His premature death was a great loss to the study of Ninjutsu, and on a personal level to his many students and friends around the world. May I ask what your own qualifications are in these subjects that allow you to dismiss his work in such an arbitrary manner? Have you even read any of his books?

[daverupa]

your knowledge of the subject revolves around "mummy dust and crazy ideas."

Does it? Where is "my knowledge of the subject" displayed in a revolving manner, as you indicate?

I suspect there's a sacred cow with an abrasion, somewhere...

[Nyana]

As for the late Dr. Glenn Morris, in his own field he was both comprehensive and authoritative. His premature death was a great loss to the study of Ninjutsu, and on a personal level to his many students and friends around the world.

Morris was eclectic, idiosyncratic, and at times bizarre.

May I ask what your own qualifications are in these subjects that allow you to dismiss his work in such an arbitrary manner? Have you even read any of his books?

Yep, I've read his books. I'm not dismissing his work or being arbitrary. I said that it isn't authoritative or comprehensive, specifically, in the context of Buddhist systems of yoga.

[Nyana]

your knowledge of the subject revolves around "mummy dust and crazy ideas."

Does it? Where is "my knowledge of the subject" displayed in a revolving manner, as you indicate?

I suspect there's a sacred cow with an abrasion, somewhere...

I suspect that there's a learned bias based on misinformation behind statements such as this:

If you are interested in chakras, you are going to become distracted from the Dhamma, but to each their own.

And this:

At least inasmuch as any two fields of knowledge cannot be pursued to the extent that one of them could be, if favored with time and energy. The Dhamma isn't necessarily easy - mental real estate is at a premium... dhammas proliferate with ease...

In any event, we are advised to calm kaya-sankhara, not multiply them and do esoteric maths.

There are no sacred cows in Buddhism, and that includes your sacred cow of a pristine, early Buddhism fully explicated in the suttas.

[marc108]

what if some demonic entity entered the chakra and possessed me, and I then had an intrusive visualization of "black energy" or "demons" or "pentagrams" being absorbed in that area, and an intrusive thought of the sentence "A demon is possessing me" or "I am possessed". My reaction to this was to tighten the area because I was worried I was letting this "negative energy" in and giving it potential to manifest, and to then attempt to relax the area again and counter it with the white light visualization, although the intrusive thoughts/visualizations kept getting in the way, so I never felt as if it was satisfactorily "countered" or that the potential for the intrusive thought's/visualization's to manifest or affect my life was ever completely erased.

really the point here i think is that nothing actually happened to you or your chakras... this entire idea doesnt find root in traditional teachings, only in new-agey stuff. what your describing sounds like anxiety... an intrusive though brought up some fear and caused papanca around it. basic, western Vipassana style labeling of thoughts can really go a long way for learning to gain some control over that process.

if you're finding the chakra stuff is causing you anxiety, which is does for many, then stop. traditionally, these are not teachings you would find being given to beginners... the focus would be on developing virtue & meditation first,

[danieLion]

If you are interested in chakras, you are going to become distracted from the Dhamma, but to each their own.

So, is your official position that the Dhamma and chakras are mutually exclusive?

At least inasmuch as any two fields of knowledge cannot be pursued to the extent that one of them could be, if favored with time and energy. The Dhamma isn't necessarily easy - mental real estate is at a premium... dhammas proliferate with ease...

In any event, we are advised to calm kaya-sankhara, not multiply them and do esoteric maths.

So, is your official position that calming kaya-sankhara and chakra work are mutually exclusive?

[danieLion]

I don't specifically know if chakras exist or not, however if they do exist, I'd like to learn more about them and work on keeping them healthy. Does anyone here know any teachers that have a good amount of experience with chakras (or other "energy work") and could possibly help me work with them?

"Existence is a very slippery notion." -Bhikkhu Bodhi
There is no necessary connection between their "existence"/"non-existence" and their utility. Like marc108 intimated, if they're not useful, don't use them. We are privileged to have numerous tools at our disposal, and the Dhamma is neither a closed book nor a respecter of tradition.

[daverupa]

So, is your official position that calming kaya-sankhara and chakra work are mutually exclusive?

It will be best if I agree to a strong adherence to the idea when phrased in the following way:

The process of human being may or may not involve chakras; anapanasati instructions do not engage that thought realm in any way. What they do accomplish, however, is a calming of sankhara in such a way that one has made it one's object to let go, thereby enabling jhana. Chakra work is not jhana.