attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Exploring the Dhamma, as understood from the perspective of the ancient Pali commentaries.
User avatar
Mr. Grimnasty
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:33 am

Re: attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Post by Mr. Grimnasty »

robertk wrote:Dear Mr Grimm
"Grimnasty". No relative of those fairy tale-writing brothers.
You are clearly well-studied in Dhamma, and insightful to boot. I can certainly give some replies to your questions but seriously I think you could do just as well.
I'm afraid not. My talent is limited to spotting problems. I'm a basketcase when it comes to finding solutions to them - for that I have to turn to wiser heads. Thanks a lot for your thoughtful response.
_________
Grimnasty
User avatar
Mr. Grimnasty
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:33 am

Re: attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Post by Mr. Grimnasty »

robertk wrote:
robertk wrote:one no longer doubts truths like kamma or rebirth
nibbuti wrote: Are you aware that the doubt hindrance (vicikicchā), as the Buddha taught it, is specifically about wholesome & unwholesome states (dhammas) and their causes, in the sense of the four noble truths, which doesn't have to include just any dogma or view that is considered 'Buddhist'?
In the Dhammasangani the fetter of doubt includes doubt about the Buddha, the Dhamma, the Sangha, the training, the past and future, and idapaccayata. I think most of these are mentioned in various suttas too.
If someone's abandoned doubts about the Buddha and now has "unshakable faith" in him (one of the attributes of a stream enterer according to the Datthabba Sutta), I shouldn't imagine she'd have any hesitation at all in accepting Buddhist dogmas.
I mean don't you think it would be a bit odd for a person of unshakable faith to say: "Gotama may have had some cool things to say about the four truths, but I think he was must have been having a bad hair day when he taught all that kamma and rebirth baloney" ?

"For a disciple who has conviction in the Teacher's message & lives to penetrate it, what accords with the Dhamma is this: 'The Blessed One is the Teacher, I am a disciple. He is the one who knows, not I.'
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

_________
Grimnasty
alan...
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:37 pm

Re: attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Post by alan... »

robertk wrote:
in reality one does not need to know anything about rebirth at all. one can simply practice the dhamma, see through reality bit by bit and eventually enter nibbana never knowing a thing about rebirth being real or not
Actually in the vipassana nanas one of the earlier stages is called paccayapariggahanana , meaning that it is seen that every moment is conditioned by other moments (including kamma). . It is also called kankhavitarana visuddhi ( Escape from all Doubt Purification- one no longer doubts truths like kamma or rebirth)
hey that's my quote! interesting. i wonder if it's a clearly specified necessity in the pali canon? or if any texts imply that one can reach nibbana without knowledge about it? i know there are some instances where people reach nibbana (or other high attainment) simply by hearing the buddha talk. the one i can think of is where he spoke to the assassins, but the talk is not detailed so i don't know whether it covered rebirth or not. so this could be some support for my idea. who knows? anyone have good canon references that say very clearly one must know about rebirth or that one can not know about it?

perhaps it's a theoretical question that really cannot be answered.

maybe a question such as: could the buddha have lead someone to nibbana without ever telling them about rebirth?

i think he could have, and in all likelihood he did, i just don't know of where it's in the suttas specifically. i know many times he gave dhamma talks to large groups of monks who were of other traditions and many attained dhamma attainments upon hearing his words and that the suttas do not always specify that they knew about the buddha's specific rebirth teachings prior to the talk nor that the buddha mentions rebirth specifically in said talk (but i could be wrong...).
daverupa
Posts: 5980
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Post by daverupa »

Mr. Grimnasty wrote:I mean don't you think it would be a bit odd for a person of unshakable faith to say: "Gotama may have had some cool things to say about the four truths, but I think he was must have been having a bad hair day when he taught all that kamma and rebirth baloney" ?
Obviously, there isn't a 1:1 correlation between the Nikayas and what we'd have if there had been audio recording for ~45 years. It's simply problematic to wave the Nikayas and say "the Buddha said it", to say nothing of much of the Tipitika.

This might seem to go without saying, but when this fact is allowed, a not altogether unexpected cultural impact on the texts can start to be examined - and, far from considering the Buddha to be a frazzled teacher, we can consider the oral tradition to be comprised of historical humans.

This isn't the sub-forum for this kind of thing, but I felt a note in passing was justified.
  • "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.

    "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.

- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
User avatar
Mr. Grimnasty
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:33 am

Re: attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Post by Mr. Grimnasty »

daverupa wrote:Obviously, there isn't a 1:1 correlation between the Nikayas and what we'd have if there had been audio recording for ~45 years. It's simply problematic to wave the Nikayas and say "the Buddha said it", to say nothing of much of the Tipitika.
I don't think it's "simply problematic". Rather, it's problematic in certain cases, but not in others. For example, it's problematic in cases where interpreters of the Nikayas are attempting to draw large conclusions from rather slim textual evidence, especially where that evidence is amenable to a variety of interpretations. But only the most rascally disingenué would stoop to asserting that Nikaya-waving is problematic in the case of a teaching as scripturally omnipresent as kamma and rebirth.

_________
Grimnasty
daverupa
Posts: 5980
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Post by daverupa »

Well, in any event I agree it's anything but simple when the textual chronology is considered.

:heart:
  • "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.

    "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.

- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
nibbuti
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:36 pm
Location: Germany

Re: attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Post by nibbuti »

Mr. Grimnasty wrote:If someone's abandoned doubts about the Buddha and now has "unshakable faith" in him (one of the attributes of a stream enterer according to the Datthabba Sutta), I shouldn't imagine she'd have any hesitation at all in accepting Buddhist dogmas.
What is the abandonment of doubts regarding the Dhamma based on? What makes this different from a 'new born' Christian who has entered the Jesus-stream and, from there on, believes the Earth is 6000 years old?
Mr. Grimnasty wrote:But only the most rascally disingenué would stoop to asserting that Nikaya-waving is problematic in the case of a teaching as scripturally omnipresent as kamma and rebirth.
It would be problematic in the case of kamma and rebirth to deny it is present. But I don't think it is omnipresent, rather mostly taught as a moral teaching or in a specific context. Not once does the Buddha care to explain how post-mortem rebirth works (unlike in the case of dependent origination of dukkha).

Also, any translation is an interpretation with different emphasis. When I talk to a faithful Christian I have no problem mentioning God as a synonym for 'nature' or 'father figure'. It comes with common language. But that does not mean belief in God is essential to me, or that it requires a 'father figure' to understand 'nature'.

:anjali:
User avatar
Mr. Grimnasty
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:33 am

Re: attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Post by Mr. Grimnasty »

nibbuti wrote:What is the abandonment of doubts regarding the Dhamma based on?
The arising of a deep insight into the nature of things as a consequence of hearing the Dhamma and which would not otherwise have arisen. Having found the Dhamma reliable in this, one is disposed to treat it as reliable in everything else.
What makes this different from a 'new born' Christian who has entered the Jesus-stream and, from there on, believes the Earth is 6000 years old?
The noble disciple has unshakable saddha in the Dhamma; the born-again Christian has unwholesome resolvedness upon (akusala adhimokkha) and attachment to (lobha) the theistic superstition.
The noble disciple has a samsaric heritage sufficiently replete with wisdom that he can discern the faithworthiness of faithworthy objects (the Triple Gem), encountering which is the proximate cause of saddha. The born-again Christian has a samsaric heritage that has left him so lacking in panna that he cannot discern the wrongness in a serious wrong view.

_________
Grimnasty
alan...
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:37 pm

Re: attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Post by alan... »

daverupa wrote:
Mr. Grimnasty wrote:I mean don't you think it would be a bit odd for a person of unshakable faith to say: "Gotama may have had some cool things to say about the four truths, but I think he was must have been having a bad hair day when he taught all that kamma and rebirth baloney" ?
Obviously, there isn't a 1:1 correlation between the Nikayas and what we'd have if there had been audio recording for ~45 years. It's simply problematic to wave the Nikayas and say "the Buddha said it", to say nothing of much of the Tipitika.

This might seem to go without saying, but when this fact is allowed, a not altogether unexpected cultural impact on the texts can start to be examined - and, far from considering the Buddha to be a frazzled teacher, we can consider the oral tradition to be comprised of historical humans.

This isn't the sub-forum for this kind of thing, but I felt a note in passing was justified.
either we accept the tipitaka as authoritative, or we don't. there is some room for saying things like "this passage appears only ONE time in the entire canon and disagrees with EVERYTHING else in it. it probably does not belong." or something similar to that. however to say anything about what the buddha did or did not say in regards to something so common and specific as his talks on rebirth is to throw out the entire tipitaka as unreliable. if all those instances are some kind of bad transmission then so is everything else and none of it has any real value beyond what each individual finds useful for them personally. if we do that we are down to just personal experience, hypothesis, and conjecture and this entire thread has no use to anyone any more in a buddhist sense and is just a thread about opinions and random thoughts that could just as well exist on facebook or somewhere else that has nothing to do with any of this.

clearly this thread is about theravada buddhism. being that it's posted on this forum and is about doctrinal questions, it is only logical to look into the doctrine of theravada buddhism. if you're going to throw the doctrinal texts out as unreliable then the thread itself loses purpose for you so why keep at it if you feel this way? see what i'm saying? if you don't believe the texts are accurate then you have made your stake in this discussion redundant since the discussion is about the information found in those very texts more or less as beyond the texts there is really no official authority on things such as "attaining nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth" and other such things.
daverupa
Posts: 5980
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Post by daverupa »

Yeah, as I had said "This isn't the sub-forum for this kind of thing", but the flippant remark to which I was drawn was low-hanging fruit.

Bad habits, alas.

:toast:
  • "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.

    "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.

- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
alan...
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:37 pm

Re: attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Post by alan... »

daverupa wrote:Yeah, as I had said "This isn't the sub-forum for this kind of thing", but the flippant remark to which I was drawn was low-hanging fruit.

Bad habits, alas.

:toast:
lol. touche'. i like the fruit analogy!
alan...
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:37 pm

Re: attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Post by alan... »

alan... wrote:
daverupa wrote:Yeah, as I had said "This isn't the sub-forum for this kind of thing", but the flippant remark to which I was drawn was low-hanging fruit.

Bad habits, alas.

:toast:
lol. touche'. i like the fruit analogy!
nibbuti
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:36 pm
Location: Germany

Re: attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Post by nibbuti »

Mr. Grimnasty wrote:The noble disciple has unshakable saddha in the Dhamma; the born-again Christian has unwholesome resolvedness upon (akusala adhimokkha) and attachment to (lobha) the theistic superstition.
Do you think the born-again Christian would agree that he has "unwholesome resolvedness upon superstition" while the "noble disciple has unshakable faith"?
Mr. Grimnasty wrote:The noble disciple has a samsaric heritage sufficiently replete with wisdom
Are you saying samsara makes the saddha wholesome? Then what makes superstition unwholesome?

:anjali:
User avatar
robertk
Posts: 5603
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:08 am

Re: attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Post by robertk »

nibbuti wrote:
Mr. Grimnasty wrote:
Mr. Grimnasty wrote:The noble disciple has a samsaric heritage sufficiently replete with wisdom
Are you saying samsara makes the saddha wholesome? Then what makes superstition unwholesome?

:anjali:
I think mr grimmnasty is referring to the pali term, often used in the texts, pubbekatapunnata, merit done/accumulayed in past lives. And that merit includes wisdom .
nibbuti
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:36 pm
Location: Germany

Re: attain nibbana without knowing about kamma and rebirth

Post by nibbuti »

robertk wrote:I think mr grimmnasty is referring to the pali term, often used in the texts, pubbekatapunnata, merit done/accumulayed in past lives. And that merit includes wisdom .
Thanks robertk.

And how is wisdom included in hypothetical "merit done/accumulated in past lives" more "wholesome" than wisdom included in hypothetical "theistic superstition" (Mr Grimnasty)?

:anjali:
Post Reply