If you couldn't be a Buddhist, what would you be?

[Billymac29]

Taosim

[Benjamin]

Good point Retro, I've actually changed the topic a bit to suit that. What other philosophies or religions caught your attention before fully accepting the Buddha's teachings? I know many of us were raised Christian, but I'm sure I'm not alone when I say it wasn't the quickest journey from there to here.

Personally I explored Daoism quite a bit. I appreciated many of it's sayings and philosophies, but all the major one's that stuck with me ended up being part of the Buddha's teachings anyway. Also Vedanta, particularly Adi Shankara and Ramana Maharshi.

Thanks,
Benjamin

[SarathW]

I was born to Buddhist parents but as majority Buddhist, my knowledge was restricted to five precepts. (I did not follow them) However the following questions always bothered me.
- Who am I?
- Why I am her?
- What is the purpose of my life?
So I started reading self development books, study five major religions and other philosophies. Aabout ten years ago one of my Islamic friends gave me the hard copy of the following and I came to the realisation of Anatta!
Since I became a Buddhist again.
Answer to your question: If I didn’t become a Buddhist I still will be looking for the answers to my three questions.

http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/buddh ... gsurw6.pdf

[Benjamin]

I was born to Buddhist parents but as majority Buddhist, my knowledge was restricted to five precepts. (I did not follow them) However the following questions always bothered me.
- Who am I?
- Why I am her?
- What is the purpose of my life?
So I started reading self development books, study five major religions and other philosophies. Aabout ten years ago one of my Islamic friends gave me the hard copy of the following and I came to the realisation of Anatta!
Since I became a Buddhist again.
Answer to your question: If I didn’t become a Buddhist I still will be looking for the answers to my three questions.

http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/buddh ... gsurw6.pdf

Interesting that your Muslim friend brought you back to Buddhism, how interesting.

[alan...]

if i had a reset on my background and was raised secular and buddhism didn't exist, then i would go hindu! fun stuff in that religion. lot's of parallels with buddhism. you get to meditate into probably some of the same blissful states but instead of discarding the bliss you get to believe it's union with god! totally sweet and way more rewarding than buddhism in an instant gratification kind of way. i find buddhism to be the most rewarding out there but i wish i could hold onto some of my attainments sometimes instead of just seeing everything as empty and looking for nibbana. in hinduism every little good thing can be kept as a gift from god instead of denied as another thing to let go of. but i would be doing a lot of the same stuff. so i would enter jhana and enjoy my gift from god instead of trying to make sure i don't attach to it and make sure i see it as not self and so on. do a bunch of nice things and imagine going to heaven to live with god because of my merit after death forever, instead of trying not to make merit for kammic reasons but just to do it anyway but selflessly with no intention behind it.

i find buddhism to be unbeatable and i could never do this, hence the need for a background reset. the only way i could enjoy things like i described would be to have no knowledge or memory of buddhism. as it is i find it to be completely and utterly correct that one should let go of everything and always seek the final attainment. not being buddhist isn't even an option for me.

however with my current background i will never go with a deeply faith based religious tradition. i was raised religious and the practical, self sustaining system of buddhism is the only thing i can work with as it works whether you believe in all of it or not! the methods and practices simply keep the mind healthy and strong. if it required my devotion to the buddha as a personal entity or something i couldn't get into that.

if i am still me with my knowledge and background, but the buddha shows up at my door and is like "uh... hey man... turns out i was wrong and... uh... i'm kind of going door to door and letting everyone know... you should just forget buddhism and go with something else. sorry..." (this is pretty much the only way i would quit buddhism )

i would immediately jump into taoism! fun stuff there as well. really beautiful. i love zen and zen shares a lot with taoism so it would be a perfect fit. the image of foggy mountains and trees and getting back to nature is so wonderful.

[David N. Snyder]

Other than Buddhism, I like philosophies like Stoicism, but they don't deal with the other worldly dimension the way traditional religions do. Of the formal religions other than Buddhism I like Daoism and Jainism.

Jainism is especially similar to Theravada and perhaps Daoism is closer to Mahayana.

I admire the ahimsa of Jainism, in their efforts to avoid all violence. I could probably handle the Jain diet okay since I am mostly vegan anyway. But I don't like their concepts of karma (kamma), nirvana (nibbana), atta, or their extremism, including nudity.

[acinteyyo]

I'd be a discordian priest... oh wait, wait, wait I already am a discordian priest... not... or am I?

[convivium]

buddhism is so broad that i think it contains everything else in one way or another.

[polarbuddha101]

I'd be a Philosopher, whereas now I'd rather be a Sage.

[Vincenzi]

(...)
if i am still me with my knowledge and background, but the buddha shows up at my door and is like "uh... hey man... turns out i was wrong and... uh... i'm kind of going door to door and letting everyone know... you should just forget buddhism and go with something else. sorry..." (this is pretty much the only way i would quit buddhism )
(...)

"if you see the Buddha on the street, kill him"

[danieLion]

1) Practicing Buddhism is not a matter of being (ontology/metaphyisics).

2) Does everyone in this thread believe Buddhist practice is mutually exclusive to all other practices?

[polarbuddha101]

1) Practicing Buddhism is not a matter of being (ontology/metaphyisics).

A rather inconsequential semantic point methinks.

2) Does everyone in this thread believe Buddhist practice is mutually exclusive to all other practices?

No, but I imagine the OP was wondering if any of us would choose some other religion or philosophy as our main guide to life if we weren't buddhists or buddhist practitioners.

[danieLion]

1) Practicing Buddhism is not a matter of being (ontology/metaphyisics).

A rather inconsequential semantic point methinks.

2) Does everyone in this thread believe Buddhist practice is mutually exclusive to all other practices?

No, but I imagine the OP was wondering if any of us would choose some other religion or philosophy as our main guide to life if we weren't buddhists or buddhist practitioners.

Perhaps, but I'll wait for the OP to respond before I speculate about whether or not (1) is in his opinoin semantically inconsequential and whether or not he agrees with your imagination about his OP and your respons to (2).

[danieLion]

buddhism is so broad that i think it contains everything else in one way or another.

even Magick?

[polarbuddha101]

1) Practicing Buddhism is not a matter of being (ontology/metaphyisics).

A rather inconsequential semantic point methinks.

2) Does everyone in this thread believe Buddhist practice is mutually exclusive to all other practices?

No, but I imagine the OP was wondering if any of us would choose some other religion or philosophy as our main guide to life if we weren't buddhists or buddhist practitioners.

Perhaps, but I'll wait for the OP to respond before I speculate about whether or not (1) is in his opinoin semantically inconsequential and whether or not he agrees with your imagination about his OP and your respons to (2).

Fair enough.

[convivium]

even Magick?

vajrayana, definitely.

[LonesomeYogurt]

2) Does everyone in this thread believe Buddhist practice is mutually exclusive to all other practices?

I don't think that's the case, but Buddhism is unique enough in its philosophy that one who practices as a Buddhist primarily may have trouble adjusting that approach to allow for other practices that aren't based in anatta, dispassion, and non-clinging.

[jonno]

Hi all. When I examine the basic teachings of all the masters of all religions, I find that their core message is one of love, compassion , and respect for all beings.At the time that's all that existed, the tag of a religion came after their deaths whereupon all the beliefs dogmas etc. we're added. So my answer is that I would not follow any religion but would try to learn from and practice these masters basic teachings and disregard the sometimes crazy and illogical belief systems that were invented and attributed to them after their deaths. To me I cannot see any major difference between the Buddhas original teachings and Jesus's teachings in the beatitudes. Just to practice simply and live with compassion and love is enough for me with no labels attached. Namaste .Jonno

[LonesomeYogurt]

Hi all. When I examine the basic teachings of all the masters of all religions, I find that their core message is one of love, compassion , and respect for all beings.At the time that's all that existed, the tag of a religion came after their deaths whereupon all the beliefs dogmas etc. we're added. So my answer is that I would not follow any religion but would try to learn from and practice these masters basic teachings and disregard the sometimes crazy and illogical belief systems that were invented and attributed to them after their deaths. To me I cannot see any major difference between the Buddhas original teachings and Jesus's teachings in the beatitudes. Just to practice simply and live with compassion and love is enough for me with no labels attached. Namaste .Jonno

But what about Christ's teachings regarding a creator God? What about Hinduism's teachings of the Atman, or Muhammad's teachings about violence? Although most religions have, at their core, a message of compassion and love, they also have important differences; in fact, many central tenants of the world's major religions are diametrically opposed to what the Buddha taught.

If someone was over at my house for dinner and asked where the restroom was, I wouldn't say, "Well now, all hallways lead to the restroom. Designations about the nature of restroom paths are simply inventions to mask an eternal, omnipresent hallway." I would give them concrete and meaningful directions to a real place. Enlightenment is just as "real" a thing, so why shouldn't the instructions for arriving there be equally tangible?

[Sam Vara]

If someone was over at my house for dinner and asked where the restroom was, I wouldn't say, "Well now, all hallways lead to the restroom.

You might if you genuinely believed that the creator was so loving that he didn't care where people took a dump. "For those who prefer to wipe with silk, our lounge curtains are most attractive..."