Pali for "definition"

An open and inclusive investigation into Buddhism and spiritual cultivation

Pali for "definition"

Postby danieLion » Sat Jan 12, 2013 11:23 pm

What are the Pali word(s) for "define", "definition", etc...?
"You stop me, obviously with a demand for a personal explanation. 'How is it, you write, 'that you reject with such immitigable scorn the very foundation-stones of Buddhism, and yet refer disciples enthusiastically to the technique of some of its subtlest super-structures?'

I laff."

-Aleister Crowley, Magick Without Tears, Chapter XXVII: Structure of Mind Based on that of Body (Haeckel and Bertrand Russell)

"Questions of reality are too important to be left to the scientists."
-Paul Feyerbend, The Tyranny of Science, p. 51 (Polity: 2012).
User avatar
danieLion
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 4:49 am
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Pali for "definition"

Postby cooran » Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:15 am

define : (v.t.) upalakkheti; viseseti; paricchindati; niccheti. (pp.) upalakkhita; visesita; paricchinna; nicchita.

definer : (m.) nirūpaka; paricchindaka.

definite : (adj.) nicchita; niyamita; paricchinna.

definite article : (m.) niyamanipāta.

definitely : (adv.) ekantena; saniyamaṃ.

definition : (nt.) upalakkhana; paricchindana. (m.) nicchaya. (f.) vavatthā.

definitive : (adj.) niyāmaka; paricchindaka; asandiddha.
http://www.budsas.org/ebud/dict-ep/dictep-d.htm
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
User avatar
cooran
 
Posts: 6051
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: Pali for "definition"

Postby Sylvester » Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:40 am

The suttas generally contrast -

byañjana/vyañjana = expression

against

attha = meaning.

Somewhat like the Western distinction between "denotaton" and "connotation".
Sylvester
 
Posts: 1172
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:57 am

Re: Pali for "definition"

Postby danieLion » Sun Jan 13, 2013 5:44 am

These are excellent responses. Thanks a lot.
"You stop me, obviously with a demand for a personal explanation. 'How is it, you write, 'that you reject with such immitigable scorn the very foundation-stones of Buddhism, and yet refer disciples enthusiastically to the technique of some of its subtlest super-structures?'

I laff."

-Aleister Crowley, Magick Without Tears, Chapter XXVII: Structure of Mind Based on that of Body (Haeckel and Bertrand Russell)

"Questions of reality are too important to be left to the scientists."
-Paul Feyerbend, The Tyranny of Science, p. 51 (Polity: 2012).
User avatar
danieLion
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 4:49 am
Location: Portland, Oregon


Return to Open Dhamma

Who is online

Registered users: Bhikkhu Pesala, Bing [Bot], binocular, convivium, Coyote, Feathers, Google [Bot], Lazy_eye, pilgrim, polarbuddha101, purple planet, reflection, retrofuturist, tinhtan