Plants ~ Borderline Beings?
- PadmaPhala
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:22 am
Re: Plants in Buddhism - Idea of B. Nature of Grasses an Tre
few living beings have more accessible bodhi nature than a bodhi tree
Are plants living beings ?
Hello everyone,
As a very beginner, this is the first (but certainly not the least) of my silly questions.
Scientifically speaking, plants are living beings. I even read a scientific article some time ago, which explained that plants actually communicate with sounds that cannot be heard by the human hear, or communicate releasing chemical stuff into the air.
So my question is: how does Buddhims consider plants?
Is picking up a flower like killing a living being?
Are plants part of the samsara?
I cannot stop wondering so I hope you can help me.
As a very beginner, this is the first (but certainly not the least) of my silly questions.
Scientifically speaking, plants are living beings. I even read a scientific article some time ago, which explained that plants actually communicate with sounds that cannot be heard by the human hear, or communicate releasing chemical stuff into the air.
So my question is: how does Buddhims consider plants?
Is picking up a flower like killing a living being?
Are plants part of the samsara?
I cannot stop wondering so I hope you can help me.
- DNS
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17191
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
- Contact:
Re: Are plants living beings ?
I believe they are considered "one-facultied" life forms.Ajisai wrote: So my question is: how does Buddhims consider plants?
No.Is picking up a flower like killing a living being?
No. Beings do not get reborn to the plant kingdom, just devas, humans, animals, and other celestial realms (according to Buddhism).Are plants part of the samsara?
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 27848
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Are plants living beings ?
Greetings,
To borrow an awesome post from Cooran...
Retro.
To borrow an awesome post from Cooran...
Metta,cooran wrote:Hello all,
An assortment of information for your delectation:
Plants ~ Borderline Beings?
http://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1204" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Plant Life
http://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=6822" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
From the Patimokkha, suddhapaacittiyaa, The Section about plant beings, 11:
"In causing damage to plant beings there is an offence entailing
expiation."
From SuttaVibhanga (Horner transl), the account leading up to this rule is
given:
"....at Alavi in the chief shrine at Alavi. Now at that time the monks of
Alavi, making repairs, were cutting down trees and having them cut down;
and a certain monk of Alavi cut down a tree, and the devata living in that
tree said to this monk:
"Do not, honoured sir, desiring to make an abode for yourself, cut down my
abode."
This monk, taking no notice, cut it down, and in doing so, struck the arm
of that devata's son. Then it occurred to that devata:
"What now if I, just here, should deprive this monk of life?" Then it
occurred to that devata:
"But this would not be suiting in me, that I were, just here, to deprive
this monk of life. What now if I were to tell this matter to the lord?"
Then this devata approached the lord, and having approached she told this
matter to the lord.
"Very good, devata, it is good that you, devata, did not deprive this monk
of life. If today you, devata, had deprived this monk of life, you,
devata, would also have produced much demerit. You go, devata; in a
certain place there is a solitary tree, go you into it."
People looked down upon, criticised, spread it about, saying:
"How can these recluses, sons of the Sakyans, cut down trees and have them
cut down? These recluses, sons of the Sakyans, are harming life that is
one-facultied." Monks heard these people who looked down upon, criticised,
spread it about. Those who were modest monks looked down upon, criticised,
spread it about, saying:
"How can these monks of Alavi cut down trees and have them cut down?"....
"Is it true, as is said, that you, monks, cut down trees and had them cut
down?"
"It is true, lord," they said.
The enlightened one, the lord, rebuked them, saying:
"How can you, foolish men, cut down trees and have them cut down? Is it
not, foolish men, for pleasing those who are not (yet) pleased.....And
thus, monks, this rule of training should be set forth:
For destruction of vegetable growth there is an offence of expiation."
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dhammastu ... sage/66737" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
.....................
From Ajahn Dhammanando:
Hi all,
This is a re-post as the formatting of the last one was a mess.
> Connie: "For people believe, O Bhikkhus, that life dwells in a tree."
This is the key point. The belief that plants and the earth possess one
faculty (either kaayindriya or jiivitindriya) was held by the
Niga.n.thas (Jains) and acelakas (non-affiliated naked ascetics); since
these were the largest and oldest sama.na groups at that time, their
beliefs had passed into common lore and so any sama.na worth his salt
was expected to conform to them (by keeping the rains retreat so as not
to tread on growing crops, by not digging the earth or damaging plants,
and by taking various precautions when building a hut). But nowhere
does the Buddha actually concede that these beliefs were correct and in
the Vinaya commentaries they are dismissed as "mere imagining".
Best wishes,
Dhammanando
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dhammastu ... sage/69259" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Plants in Early Buddhism and the Far Eastern idea of the Buddha Nature of Grasses and Trees
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47341101/Plan ... -and-Trees" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
with metta
Chris
Retro.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Re: Are plants living beings ?
Killing means the intentional destruction of any living
being. The Pāli term pāna strictly means the psycho-physical
life pertaining to one’s particular existence. The wanton destruction
of this life force, without allowing it to run its due
course, is pānātipāta. Pāna means that which breathes. Hence
all animate beings, including animals, are regarded as pāna,
but not plants as they possess no mind. Bhikkhus, however,
are forbidden to destroy even plant life. This rule, it may be
mentioned, does not apply to lay-followers.
http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/buddh ... gsurw6.pdf
PS:The way I understand they have Jivithandriya
being. The Pāli term pāna strictly means the psycho-physical
life pertaining to one’s particular existence. The wanton destruction
of this life force, without allowing it to run its due
course, is pānātipāta. Pāna means that which breathes. Hence
all animate beings, including animals, are regarded as pāna,
but not plants as they possess no mind. Bhikkhus, however,
are forbidden to destroy even plant life. This rule, it may be
mentioned, does not apply to lay-followers.
http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/buddh ... gsurw6.pdf
PS:The way I understand they have Jivithandriya
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
Re: Are plants living beings ?
David, thank you for your very clear answers.
What does "one-facultied" mean? Does it mean that it can only grow?
Retrofuturist, thanks a lot for all the links and readings. I am going read this carefully.
What does "one-facultied" mean? Does it mean that it can only grow?
Retrofuturist, thanks a lot for all the links and readings. I am going read this carefully.
- DNS
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17191
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
- Contact:
Re: Are plants living beings ?
I think so. It probably means that it is just a rudimentary form of life, not one with consciousness, perceptions. Plants do react to sunlight, they do 'consume' water and other things, but it is reactive, [apparently] no decisions being made.Ajisai wrote: What does "one-facultied" mean? Does it mean that it can only grow?
Can Plants think?
Hello all,
Interesting
Can Plants think?
http://www.sciencefriday.com/segment/01 ... think.html
With metta,
Chris
Interesting
Can Plants think?
http://www.sciencefriday.com/segment/01 ... think.html
With metta,
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
Re: Can Plants think?
No, according to Abhidhamma not even life!
In Abhidhamma trees, plants, mountains and others
are all taken to be external, not internal. Therefore, we cannot
say there is Jīvita in plants or trees. Jīvita, as you see here,
arises only internally. Jīvita-navaka and all these Kammaja
groupings arise internally only. So Jīvita cannot be found
outside living beings according to Abhidhamma. Abhidhamma
takes trees and others as non-living things, not as living
beings. It would be wrong to say that there is Jīvita in trees or
plants. We should be very careful when we talk about these
things. There may be what is called life in plants or in trees,
but that life is not Jīvita. It may be some other thing which is
called life.
Page 356:
http://buddhispano.net/sites/default/fi ... ies-II.pdf
In Abhidhamma trees, plants, mountains and others
are all taken to be external, not internal. Therefore, we cannot
say there is Jīvita in plants or trees. Jīvita, as you see here,
arises only internally. Jīvita-navaka and all these Kammaja
groupings arise internally only. So Jīvita cannot be found
outside living beings according to Abhidhamma. Abhidhamma
takes trees and others as non-living things, not as living
beings. It would be wrong to say that there is Jīvita in trees or
plants. We should be very careful when we talk about these
things. There may be what is called life in plants or in trees,
but that life is not Jīvita. It may be some other thing which is
called life.
Page 356:
http://buddhispano.net/sites/default/fi ... ies-II.pdf
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
Re: Can Plants think?
Hello all,
New research on plant intelligence may forever change how you think about plants
http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-01-09/n ... out-plants
With metta,
Chris
New research on plant intelligence may forever change how you think about plants
http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-01-09/n ... out-plants
With metta,
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
Re: Can Plants think?
Plant intentionality and the phenomenological framework of plant intelligence brings a whole new perspective to the suttas talking about beings living in trees, such as MN 45.
MN 45: Cula-dhammasamadana Sutta wrote: Just as if a maluva creeper pod were to burst open in the last month of the hot season, and a maluva creeper seed were to fall at the foot of a sala tree. The deva living in the tree would become frightened, apprehensive, & anxious. Her friends & companions, relatives & kin — garden devas, forest devas, tree devas, devas living in herbs, grass, & forest monarchs — would gather together to console her: 'Have no fear, have no fear. In all likelihood a peacock is sure to swallow this maluva creeper seed, or a deer will eat it, or a brush fire will burn it up, or woodsmen will pick it up, or termites will carry it off, and anyway it probably isn't really a seed.'
Re: Can Plants think?
Cooran, I look forward to reading the New Yorker article by Michael Pollan.
"Refracted rearwards along the course of evolution, consciousness displays itself qualitatively as a spectrum of shifting shades whose lower terms are lost in the night." - Teilhard de Chardin
"Refracted rearwards along the course of evolution, consciousness displays itself qualitatively as a spectrum of shifting shades whose lower terms are lost in the night." - Teilhard de Chardin
Rain soddens what is covered up,
It does not sodden what is open.
Therefore uncover what is covered
That the rain will not sodden it. Ud 5.5
It does not sodden what is open.
Therefore uncover what is covered
That the rain will not sodden it. Ud 5.5
Re: Can Plants think?
What is the difference between plants and our body ...
.
.
- lyndon taylor
- Posts: 1835
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:41 pm
- Location: Redlands, US occupied Northern Mexico
- Contact:
Re: Can Plants think?
Duh, we have a brain!!!
18 years ago I made one of the most important decisions of my life and entered a local Cambodian Buddhist Temple as a temple boy and, for only 3 weeks, an actual Therevada Buddhist monk. I am not a scholar, great meditator, or authority on Buddhism, but Buddhism is something I love from the Bottom of my heart. It has taught me sobriety, morality, peace, and very importantly that my suffering is optional, and doesn't have to run my life. I hope to give back what little I can to the Buddhist community, sincerely former monk John
http://trickleupeconomictheory.blogspot.com/
http://trickleupeconomictheory.blogspot.com/
Re: Can Plants think?
He's made a business of writing stories like this. Gets a lot of play in free media, but tells us nothing of any use.