The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism
plwk
Posts: 1462
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:14 am

The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

Post by plwk »

Image

If Thai Buddhism has been corrupted and lost its way, as critics are alleging, you would never know it by talking to Mod and her friends, whose devotion keeps them making merit and seeking solace at Wat Tha Mai, one of Bangkok's scores of Buddhist temples, every weekend. More here
User avatar
Goofaholix
Posts: 4017
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:49 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

Post by Goofaholix »

plwk wrote:whose devotion keeps them making merit and seeking solace... every weekend
I would have thought that was evidence enough.
Pronouns (no self / not self)
“Peace is within oneself to be found in the same place as agitation and suffering. It is not found in a forest or on a hilltop, nor is it given by a teacher. Where you experience suffering, you can also find freedom from suffering. Trying to run away from suffering is actually to run toward it.”
― Ajahn Chah
User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 4646
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

Post by Bhikkhu Pesala »

If people stopped regarding the faults of others, and instead corrected their own defects, perhaps they would find the right way again.

If you look down you will see the ants apparently lost and not knowing which way to run, but if you look up you will see the vast emptiness of space. Then you may wonder about your own significance in this universe, and how you came to be here.
BlogPāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
User avatar
appicchato
Posts: 1602
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:47 am
Location: Bridge on the River Kwae

Re: The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

Post by appicchato »

If you look down you will see the ants apparently lost and not knowing which way to run, but if you look up you will see the vast emptiness of space. Then you may wonder about your own significance in this universe, and how you came to be here.
+1
User avatar
manas
Posts: 2678
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:04 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

Post by manas »

Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:If people stopped regarding the faults of others, and instead corrected their own defects, perhaps they would find the right way again.

If you look down you will see the ants apparently lost and not knowing which way to run, but if you look up you will see the vast emptiness of space. Then you may wonder about your own significance in this universe, and how you came to be here.
The Dhammapada is in agreement:
50. Let none find fault with others; let none see the omissions and commissions of others. But let one see one's own acts, done and undone.


And, a word of warning, any men struggling with sensual desire should know that there is a photo of a scantily clad young woman in that article linked to. So get the mind into the 'perception of the foul' before you click, rather than retrospectively...

EDIT: Yes, the girl in the photo is praying. But the photo, along with the caption underneath, isn't what I would call edifying.

:anjali:
Last edited by manas on Wed Feb 06, 2013 5:10 am, edited 2 times in total.
To the Buddha-refuge i go; to the Dhamma-refuge i go; to the Sangha-refuge i go.
User avatar
cooran
Posts: 8503
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

Post by cooran »

But then there is this perspective - looking at oneself:

http://Www.tricycle.com/dharma-talk/power-judgment" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
(judgmental is bad .... Judicious is good)
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
User avatar
GraemeR
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:20 am
Location: Thailand

The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

Post by GraemeR »

plwk wrote:
If Thai Buddhism has been corrupted and lost its way, as critics are alleging, you would never know it by talking to Mod and her friends, whose devotion keeps them making merit and seeking solace at Wat Tha Mai, one of Bangkok's scores of Buddhist temples, every weekend. More here
If you read the whole article, which shows a scantily clad girl praying, it gives quite a different perspective than this excerpt with the confusion of Hinduism, Chinese religion and superstition.

To me the whole concept of merit making can be a problem as people are doing something for themselves to accrue merit, rather than for the sake of doing good.

People give food to monks in the belief that will get them food in heaven for example.

With metta

Graham
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27848
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,
GraemeR wrote:To me the whole concept of merit making can be a problem as people are doing something for themselves to accrue merit, rather than for the sake of doing good.

People give food to monks in the belief that will get them food in heaven for example.
On a related note, a Facebook page that I receive notifications from often shows pictures of people offering alms to monks at a certain Dhammayuttika temple.

What I find curious about this is that in all the photos, the adults are looking very stern and po-faced, as if it's a very grave and solemn occasion.

However, as the following sutta extract shows, dana should be "an ornament for the mind, a support for the mind", and should therefore presumably induce a joyous and happy mind. Perhaps in light of this, they might even manage crack a smile?

Yet, if someone has a face on them like a sucked lemon, you wonder whether they're doing it right...
AN 7.49 wrote:Then, on the following Uposatha day, the lay followers from Campa went to Ven. Sariputta and, on arrival, having bowed down to him, stood to one side. Then Ven. Sariputta, together with the lay followers from Campa, went to the Blessed One and on arrival, having bowed down to him, sat to one side. As he was sitting there, he said to the Blessed One: "Might there be the case where a person gives a gift of a certain sort and it does not bear great fruit or great benefit, whereas another person gives a gift of the same sort and it bears great fruit and great benefit?"

"Yes, Sariputta, there would be the case where a person gives a gift of a certain sort and it does not bear great fruit or great benefit, whereas another person gives a gift of the same sort and it bears great fruit and great benefit."

"Lord, what is the cause, what is the reason, why a person gives a gift of a certain sort and it does not bear great fruit or great benefit, whereas another person gives a gift of the same sort and it bears great fruit and great benefit?"

"Sariputta, there is the case where a person gives a gift seeking his own profit, with a mind attached [to the reward], seeking to store up for himself [with the thought], 'I'll enjoy this after death.' He gives his gift — food, drink, clothing, a vehicle; a garland, perfume, & ointment; bedding, shelter, & a lamp — to a brahman or a contemplative. What do you think, Sariputta? Might a person give such a gift as this?"

"Yes, lord."

"Having given this gift seeking his own profit — with a mind attached [to the reward], seeking to store up for himself, [with the thought], 'I'll enjoy this after death' — on the break-up of the body, after death, he reappears in the company of the Four Great Kings. Then, having exhausted that action, that power, that status, that sovereignty, he is a returner, coming back to this world.

"Then there is the case of a person who gives a gift not seeking his own profit, not with a mind attached [to the reward], not seeking to store up for himself, nor [with the thought], 'I'll enjoy this after death.' Instead, he gives a gift with the thought, 'Giving is good.' He gives his gift — food, drink, clothing, a vehicle; a garland, perfume, & ointment; bedding, shelter, & a lamp — to a brahman or a contemplative. What do you think, Sariputta? Might a person give such a gift as this?"

"Yes, lord."

"Having given this gift with the thought, 'Giving is good,' on the break-up of the body, after death, he reappears in the company of the Devas of the Thirty-three. Then, having exhausted that action, that power, that status, that sovereignty, he is a returner, coming back to this world.

"Or, instead of thinking, 'Giving is good,' he gives a gift with the thought, 'This was given in the past, done in the past, by my father & grandfather. It would not be right for me to let this old family custom be discontinued'... on the break-up of the body, after death, he reappears in the company of the Devas of the Hours. Then, having exhausted that action, that power, that status, that sovereignty, he is a returner, coming back to this world.

"Or, instead... he gives a gift with the thought, 'I am well-off. These are not well-off. It would not be right for me, being well-off, not to give a gift to those who are not well-off'... on the break-up of the body, after death, he reappears in the company of the Contented Devas. Then, having exhausted that action, that power, that status, that sovereignty, he is a returner, coming back to this world.

"Or, instead... he gives a gift with the thought, 'Just as there were the great sacrifices of the sages of the past — Atthaka, Vamaka, Vamadeva, Vessamitta, Yamataggi, Angirasa, Bharadvaja, Vasettha, Kassapa, & Bhagu — in the same way will this be my distribution of gifts'... on the break-up of the body, after death, he reappears in the company of the devas who delight in creation. Then, having exhausted that action, that power, that status, that sovereignty, he is a returner, coming back to this world.

"Or, instead... he gives a gift with the thought, 'When this gift of mine is given, it makes the mind serene. Gratification & joy arise'... on the break-up of the body, after death, he reappears in the company of the devas who have power over the creations of others. Then, having exhausted that action, that power, that status, that sovereignty, he is a returner, coming back to this world.

"Or, instead of thinking, 'When this gift of mine is given, it makes the mind serene. Gratification & joy arise,' he gives a gift with the thought, 'This is an ornament for the mind, a support for the mind.' He gives his gift — food, drink, clothing, a vehicle; a garland, perfume, & ointment; bedding, shelter, & a lamp — to a brahman or a contemplative. What do you think, Sariputta? Might a person give such a gift as this?"

"Yes, lord."

"Having given this, not seeking his own profit, not with a mind attached [to the reward], not seeking to store up for himself, nor [with the thought], 'I'll enjoy this after death,'

" — nor with the thought, 'Giving is good,'

" — nor with the thought, 'This was given in the past, done in the past, by my father & grandfather. It would not be right for me to let this old family custom be discontinued,'

" — nor with the thought, 'I am well-off. These are not well-off. It would not be right for me, being well-off, not to give a gift to those who are not well-off,' nor with the thought, 'Just as there were the great sacrifices of the sages of the past — Atthaka, Vamaka, Vamadeva, Vessamitta, Yamataggi, Angirasa, Bharadvaja, Vasettha, Kassapa, & Bhagu — in the same way this will be my distribution of gifts,'

" — nor with the thought, 'When this gift of mine is given, it makes the mind serene. Gratification & joy arise,'

" — but with the thought, 'This is an ornament for the mind, a support for the mind' — on the break-up of the body, after death, he reappears in the company of Brahma's Retinue. Then, having exhausted that action, that power, that status, that sovereignty, he is a non-returner. He does not come back to this world.

"This, Sariputta, is the cause, this is the reason, why a person gives a gift of a certain sort and it does not bear great fruit or great benefit, whereas another person gives a gift of the same sort and it bears great fruit and great benefit."
Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Sylvester
Posts: 2204
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:57 am

Re: The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

Post by Sylvester »

Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:If people stopped regarding the faults of others, and instead corrected their own defects, perhaps they would find the right way again.

If you look down you will see the ants apparently lost and not knowing which way to run, but if you look up you will see the vast emptiness of space. Then you may wonder about your own significance in this universe, and how you came to be here.

+2

What I find even more worrying is a tiny but perceptible shift amongst modern/Protestant Buddhists that the Buddha ever made a deontic fuss about the practical goals of the householder. I don't think the suttas have ever had a "thou shalt" frame of reference, except as hypothetical imperatives (do this to achieve this).

I confess that I too used to feel revolted by the spiritual materialism I witnessed in merit-making. But it dawned on me that this kind of aversion is simply the product of a curmudgeonly attitude to difference. And it's a latent tendency that drives rebirth in a bad way! Why cling to it?

For a healthy dose of spiritual materialism advocated by the Buddha-
This was said by the Blessed One, said by the Arahant, so I have heard: "Monks, don't be afraid of acts of merit. This is another way of saying what is blissful, desirable, pleasing, endearing, charming — i.e., acts of merit. I am cognizant that, having long performed meritorious deeds, I long experienced desirable, pleasing, endearing, charming results. Having developed a mind of good will for seven years, then for seven aeons of contraction & expansion I didn't return to this world. Whenever the aeon was contracting, I went to the realm of Streaming Radiance. Whenever the aeon was expanding, I reappeared in an empty Brahma-abode. There I was the Great Brahman, the Unconquered Conqueror, All-seeing, & Wielder of Power. Then for thirty-six times I was Sakka, ruler of the gods. For many hundreds of times I was a king, a wheel-turning emperor, a righteous king of Dhamma, conqueror of the four corners of the earth, maintaining stable control over the countryside, endowed with the seven treasures[*] — to say nothing of the times I was a local king. The thought occurred to me: 'Of what action of mine is this the fruit, of what action the result, that I now have such great power & might?' Then the thought occurred to me: 'This is the fruit of my three [types of] action, the result of three types of action, that I now have such great power & might: i.e., generosity, self-control, & restraint.'"

Train in acts of merit
that bring long-lasting bliss —
develop generosity,
a life in tune,
a mind of good-will.
Developing these
three things
that bring about bliss,
the wise reappear
in a world of bliss
unalloyed.

It 22
User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 19943
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Aotearoa, New Zealand

Re: The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

Post by mikenz66 »

retrofuturist wrote: On a related note, a Facebook page that I receive notifications from often shows pictures of people offering alms to monks at a certain Dhammayuttika temple.

What I find curious about this is that in all the photos, the adults are looking very stern and po-faced, as if it's a very grave and solemn occasion.
It would be unusual to see a grumpy Thai person in that situation. However, it is a serious, occasion, since it is a time of mindful reflection for the monks and lay people alike, not a time for frivolity. Perhaps you're mistaking seriousness for grumpiness?

Hmm, was going to post a picture of a happy 80-something woman giving alms at our Wat, but the attachment button seems to have disappeared with the upgrade.

So here's a typical Thailand scene, complete with mindful dog...

Image

:anjali:
Mike
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27848
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,
mikenz66 wrote:Perhaps you're mistaking seriousness for grumpiness?
I have no doubt they're "serious"... but when "seriousness" actually inhibits (rather than promotes) sukha, what use is it?

As Samuel Butler said, "The one serious conviction that a man should have is that nothing is to be taken too seriously."

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 19943
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Aotearoa, New Zealand

Re: The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

Post by mikenz66 »

Hi Retro,

I haven't seen the photos you are talking about, so it's very hard to figure out exactly what you are talking about. However, I think that it would be a mistake to assume that smiling is necessary, or appropriate, at such times, or that lack of a smile signals a negative state of mind. I certainly wouldn't be grinning while the monks were chanting a Pali blessing, as in the photo I posted.

:anjali:
Mike
plwk
Posts: 1462
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:14 am

Re: The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

Post by plwk »

Mike... unless I have a cat bias, that dog looks like it was going to poop in front of the Bhikkhus... :tongue:
Sylvester
Posts: 2204
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:57 am

Re: The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

Post by Sylvester »

I couldn't bring myself to say it but now that it's been said ... SQUAT!
User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 19943
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Aotearoa, New Zealand

Re: The Crisis in Thai Buddhism

Post by mikenz66 »

plwk wrote:Mike... unless I have a cat bias, that dog looks like it was going to poop in front of the Bhikkhus... :tongue:
Well I did say this was a typical Thailand scene... :jumping:

And I think it's obvious from its expression that it is being very mindful... :tongue:

:anjali:
Mike
Post Reply