That's one viewpoint, Alan. There are others with as much, or more, in their favour.alan wrote:It's a stupid practice that creates nothing other than flies and bees hovering around statues.
Kim
That's one viewpoint, Alan. There are others with as much, or more, in their favour.alan wrote:It's a stupid practice that creates nothing other than flies and bees hovering around statues.
Everywhere in Thailand there are statues with offerings representing offerings to the Buddha. That in itself is a good thing, IMO, since the practice reminds the donors and others of the virtues of generosity and respect. Whether or not Buddha truly needs another bottle of orange soda and, if so, whether he needs to drink it from a plastic straw, may not be so important.alan wrote:Everywhere in Thailand there are statues reeking with trash and junk food, which of course draws insects. I've often wondered if Buddha truly needs another bottle of orange soda, and if so, does he need to drink it from a plastic straw?
There are those who do these things as an outward form of respect and there are those who do it due to wrong view, particularly silabata paramasa.Kim OHara wrote: Everywhere in Thailand there are statues with offerings representing offerings to the Buddha. That in itself is a good thing, IMO, since the practice reminds the donors and others of the virtues of generosity and respect. Whether or not Buddha truly needs another bottle of orange soda and, if so, whether he needs to drink it from a plastic straw, may not be so important.
I agreeThat in itself is a good thing, IMO, since the practice reminds the donors and others of the virtues of generosity and respect.
They may make good karma and get good rebirth, if the offerings help cultivate virtues of generosity and respect.The Buddha might not care for a soda, but he might be concerned about people who give regular offerings to statues thinking it'll make good karma and get them a good rebirth.