The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
- LonesomeYogurt
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:24 pm
- Location: America
The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
I've heard a few people make claims that enlightenment is no longer possible in this day and age, and just today I read in another discussion here someone claiming that the higher Jhanas (above the first) were no longer available either. I was wondering if there is anything to back this claim up, where the idea comes from, and how it is justified? I don't mean to attack those who hold these beliefs, but I'm just curious as to whether or not they have a reasonable basis in the Suttas?
Gain and loss, status and disgrace,
censure and praise, pleasure and pain:
these conditions among human beings are inconstant,
impermanent, subject to change.
Knowing this, the wise person, mindful,
ponders these changing conditions.
Desirable things don’t charm the mind,
undesirable ones bring no resistance.
His welcoming and rebelling are scattered,
gone to their end,
do not exist.
- Lokavipatti Sutta
Stuff I write about things.
censure and praise, pleasure and pain:
these conditions among human beings are inconstant,
impermanent, subject to change.
Knowing this, the wise person, mindful,
ponders these changing conditions.
Desirable things don’t charm the mind,
undesirable ones bring no resistance.
His welcoming and rebelling are scattered,
gone to their end,
do not exist.
- Lokavipatti Sutta
Stuff I write about things.
Re: The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
How would these people know if other people in other continents aren't accessing higher states of meditation?
Re: The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
Hello LY,
There are previous discussions around the Dhamma Ending Age and what disappears at that point. Here is one of the threads:
Dhamma-ending age
http://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2733" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
with metta
Chris
There are previous discussions around the Dhamma Ending Age and what disappears at that point. Here is one of the threads:
Dhamma-ending age
http://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2733" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
with metta
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
Re: The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
Hello,LonesomeYogurt wrote:I've heard a few people make claims that enlightenment is no longer possible in this day and age, and just today I read in another discussion here someone claiming that the higher Jhanas (above the first) were no longer available either.
I think people who hold such views actually make the Dhamma end - at least for themselves. I would even go so far to say that they are heading for hell if others believe that demotivating nonsense and stop striving because of it. As long as the teachings are available and as long as people are willing to put them into practice with the utmost effort, there will be liberation. This is my conviction.
Greetings
Re: The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
Do you think the Vinaya should be discounted.detrop wrote:Hello,LonesomeYogurt wrote:I've heard a few people make claims that enlightenment is no longer possible in this day and age, and just today I read in another discussion here someone claiming that the higher Jhanas (above the first) were no longer available either.
I think people who hold such views actually make the Dhamma end - at least for themselves. I would even go so far to say that they are heading for hell if others believe that demotivating nonsense and stop striving because of it. As long as the teachings are available and as long as people are willing to put them into practice with the utmost effort, there will be liberation. This is my conviction.
Greetings
“If, Ananda, women had not obtained the going forth from home into homelessness in the dhamma and discipline proclaimed by the Truth-finder, the Brahma-faring, Ananda, would have lasted long, true dhamma would have endured for a thousand years. But since, Ananda, women have gone forth…in the dhamma and discipline proclaimed by the Truth-finder, now, Ananda, the Brah
Re: The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
robertk wrote:Do you think the Vinaya should be discounted.detrop wrote:Hello,LonesomeYogurt wrote:I've heard a few people make claims that enlightenment is no longer possible in this day and age, and just today I read in another discussion here someone claiming that the higher Jhanas (above the first) were no longer available either.
I think people who hold such views actually make the Dhamma end - at least for themselves. I would even go so far to say that they are heading for hell if others believe that demotivating nonsense and stop striving because of it. As long as the teachings are available and as long as people are willing to put them into practice with the utmost effort, there will be liberation. This is my conviction.
Greetings
“If, Ananda, women had not obtained the going forth from home into homelessness in the dhamma and discipline proclaimed by the Truth-finder, the Brahma-faring, Ananda, would have lasted long, true dhamma would have endured for a thousand years. But since, Ananda, women have gone forth…in the dhamma and discipline proclaimed by the Truth-finder, now, Ananda, the Brah
How do we know that the above misogynic quote is true and was spoken by the Buddha?
Re: The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
Thats exactly what it sounds like to me patriarchal, culture bound, misogynistic crap. You fellows shouldn't necessarily believe everything you read.Alex123 wrote:
How do we know that the above misogynic quote is true and was spoken by the Buddha?
“The truth knocks on the door and you say, "Go away, I'm looking for the truth," and so it goes away. Puzzling.” ― Robert M. Pirsig
Re: The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
Almost every time, I see this sutta quoted, the passage following this part is omitted. If you read further, you would note that the Buddha then counteracts this possibility by introducing the Garudhammas.robertk wrote:
“If, Ananda, women had not obtained the going forth from home into homelessness in the dhamma and discipline proclaimed by the Truth-finder, the Brahma-faring, Ananda, would have lasted long, true dhamma would have endured for a thousand years. But since, Ananda, women have gone forth…in the dhamma and discipline proclaimed by the Truth-finder, now, Ananda, the Brah
"Just as a man might make an embankment in advance around a great reservoir to keep the waters from overflowing, in the same way I have set forth in advance the eight rules of respect for bhikkhunīs"
Re: The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
You may be interested in the second part of Bronkhorst's Absorbtion: the Psychology of the Buddha.
"This study is an experiment, or rather, it takes you on a voyage of discovery. It begins with a
map that shows the way to a treasure. It follows the map faithfully, and exhibits the treasure
that it finds.
This study is not about a real map, nor is it about a physical treasure. It starts with the
working hypothesis that certain central claims of the early Buddhist texts are true and tries to
determine what implications this has for psychological theory."
Absorption PDF
http://ebookbrowse.com/absorption-bronk ... d125112604" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"This study is an experiment, or rather, it takes you on a voyage of discovery. It begins with a
map that shows the way to a treasure. It follows the map faithfully, and exhibits the treasure
that it finds.
This study is not about a real map, nor is it about a physical treasure. It starts with the
working hypothesis that certain central claims of the early Buddhist texts are true and tries to
determine what implications this has for psychological theory."
Absorption PDF
http://ebookbrowse.com/absorption-bronk ... d125112604" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
Ok maybe I read it wrong. The sutta says because of ordaining women the sassana would only last for 500 years but due to the Buddha giving the garudhamma it could still a 1000.pilgrim wrote:Almost every time, I see this sutta quoted, the passage following this part is omitted. If you read further, you would note that the Buddha then counteracts this possibility by introducing the Garudhammas.robertk wrote:
“If, Ananda, women had not obtained the going forth from home into homelessness in the dhamma and discipline proclaimed by the Truth-finder, the Brahma-faring, Ananda, would have lasted long, true dhamma would have endured for a thousand years. But since, Ananda, women have gone forth…in the dhamma and discipline proclaimed by the Truth-finder, now, Ananda, the Brah
"Just as a man might make an embankment in advance around a great reservoir to keep the waters from overflowing, in the same way I have set forth in advance the eight rules of respect for bhikkhunīs"
You are saying it could last longer?
Could you show me where in the sutra it says that
Re: The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
This is exactly why the whole passage is suspicious; it has been analyzed elsewhere at great length.pilgrim wrote:Almost every time, I see this sutta quoted, the passage following this part is omitted. If you read further, you would note that the Buddha then counteracts this possibility by introducing the Garudhammas.robertk wrote:
“If, Ananda, women had not obtained the going forth from home into homelessness in the dhamma and discipline proclaimed by the Truth-finder, the Brahma-faring, Ananda, would have lasted long, true dhamma would have endured for a thousand years. But since, Ananda, women have gone forth…in the dhamma and discipline proclaimed by the Truth-finder, now, Ananda, the Brah
"Just as a man might make an embankment in advance around a great reservoir to keep the waters from overflowing, in the same way I have set forth in advance the eight rules of respect for bhikkhunīs"
It looks like a later apocalyptic theme, and is probably not buddhavacana. I think it's highly questionable support for anything.
- "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.
"And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.
- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
Re: The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
A nice comment at the end of the treatise that you kindly included:
My sense (arising out of faith/optimism) is that the awakened Guatama would not have had as part of his Dhamma elements of bias or debasing of women in the sangha. As he was cutting against the grain of Vedic culture, it would seem inconsistent to adopt a balanced and egalitarian view toward the sangha and then at the same time impose arbitrary restrictions based on gender.
The Buddha had it all sorted out, and later, the CE male monks decided that the old Brahmanic misogynism needed to return...this subordination of women is still seen in the Thai Sangha today....but it's not Dhamma.
bold added.There are several tentative theories about this ranging from Ven Bhikkhu Sujato's related to the Second Council, to around the 4th century CE between nine hundred and one thousand years after the Buddha's Parinibbana, when the social, multi-religious and multi-cultural tides of the world began, in mass, to turn away from what appears to have been the earlier egalitarianism of the Buddhist Sangha.
My sense (arising out of faith/optimism) is that the awakened Guatama would not have had as part of his Dhamma elements of bias or debasing of women in the sangha. As he was cutting against the grain of Vedic culture, it would seem inconsistent to adopt a balanced and egalitarian view toward the sangha and then at the same time impose arbitrary restrictions based on gender.
The Buddha had it all sorted out, and later, the CE male monks decided that the old Brahmanic misogynism needed to return...this subordination of women is still seen in the Thai Sangha today....but it's not Dhamma.
Re: The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
The Buddha may have recognized the Dionysian element in women, but being progressive and compassionate in his outlook he saw the need for inclusiveness in any society, including the Sangha. The concept of the Dionysian and the Apollonian lends itself to some interesting speculations. Camille Paglia's theory is particularly entertaining, and yet to me it does seem to have some merit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollonian ... .27s_usage" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollonian ... .27s_usage" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Dhammā=Ideas. This is the clue to much of the Buddha's teaching." ~ Ven. Ñanavira, Commonplace Book
Re: The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
Mmmh..., this thread has gone quite a bit , hasn't it?
Okay, so what I can say on the topic:
I am quite confident that there are people who attain all kinds of jhanas today, and, much more importantly, that there are living sotapannas, sakadagamis, anagamis and arahants on our planet.
I find it quite astounding especially how the former point can be doubted so much, and on what basis?
If you just look at the Pa Auk system for example and people who follow that, it all seems quite solid, the people seem to reach jhana etc. And even if one doubts that, still, on what basis do people make such claims as "This cannot be reached anymore today"?
As for sotapanna and more, the scriptural basis for this has been pointed out here, and I have been confused by that for quite some time, too. It still confuses me how such a thing can be in the Tipitaka, especially considering what purpose it should serve. I have no idea, and I want to leave it at that. I just can say I have faith that this and that person in this day and age has reached such a stage.
In the end, it's all a matter of faith and doubt. Be it faith or doubt in the absolute validity of every text in the scriptures, or in this and that person's attainments, or one's own experience. I think there's not too much to be gained by arguing back and forth.
But still for this one point I would like to see the argument behind it: Where does the idea come from that jhanas cannot be reached anymore? Does it have to do with the idea that jhanas are part and parcel of stages of awakening, maybe even that only a sotapanna or higher could (and must be able to?) reach jhana?
Okay, so what I can say on the topic:
I am quite confident that there are people who attain all kinds of jhanas today, and, much more importantly, that there are living sotapannas, sakadagamis, anagamis and arahants on our planet.
I find it quite astounding especially how the former point can be doubted so much, and on what basis?
If you just look at the Pa Auk system for example and people who follow that, it all seems quite solid, the people seem to reach jhana etc. And even if one doubts that, still, on what basis do people make such claims as "This cannot be reached anymore today"?
As for sotapanna and more, the scriptural basis for this has been pointed out here, and I have been confused by that for quite some time, too. It still confuses me how such a thing can be in the Tipitaka, especially considering what purpose it should serve. I have no idea, and I want to leave it at that. I just can say I have faith that this and that person in this day and age has reached such a stage.
In the end, it's all a matter of faith and doubt. Be it faith or doubt in the absolute validity of every text in the scriptures, or in this and that person's attainments, or one's own experience. I think there's not too much to be gained by arguing back and forth.
But still for this one point I would like to see the argument behind it: Where does the idea come from that jhanas cannot be reached anymore? Does it have to do with the idea that jhanas are part and parcel of stages of awakening, maybe even that only a sotapanna or higher could (and must be able to?) reach jhana?
- Cittasanto
- Posts: 6646
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
- Location: Ellan Vannin
- Contact:
Re: The possibility of Jhana and enlightenment
if one considers that this is more visudhimagga than sutta, and that the sutta's sugest that it isn't quite as strong... the claim does fall flat on it's face.perkele wrote: I am quite confident that there are people who attain all kinds of jhanas today, and, much more importantly, that there are living sotapannas, sakadagamis, anagamis and arahants on our planet.
If you just look at the Pa Auk system for example and people who follow that, it all seems quite solid, the people seem to reach jhana etc. And even if one doubts that, still, on what basis do people make such claims as "This cannot be reached anymore today"?
I am more than confident that there are, and am convinced I have met one "Once Returner".
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill