Can Plants think?

Casual discussion amongst spiritual friends.
User avatar
cooran
Posts: 7799
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1
Location: Queensland, Australia

Can Plants think?

Postby cooran » Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:47 am

Hello all,

Interesting

Can Plants think?
http://www.sciencefriday.com/segment/01 ... think.html

With metta,
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---

SarathW
Posts: 2736
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1006

Re: Can Plants think?

Postby SarathW » Tue Feb 11, 2014 1:55 am

No, according to Abhidhamma not even life!

:shrug:

In Abhidhamma trees, plants, mountains and others
are all taken to be external, not internal. Therefore, we cannot
say there is Jīvita in plants or trees. Jīvita, as you see here,
arises only internally. Jīvita-navaka and all these Kammaja
groupings arise internally only. So Jīvita cannot be found
outside living beings according to Abhidhamma. Abhidhamma
takes trees and others as non-living things, not as living
beings. It would be wrong to say that there is Jīvita in trees or
plants. We should be very careful when we talk about these
things. There may be what is called life in plants or in trees,
but that life is not Jīvita. It may be some other thing which is
called life.
Page 356:

http://buddhispano.net/sites/default/fi ... ies-II.pdf

User avatar
cooran
Posts: 7799
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: Can Plants think?

Postby cooran » Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:17 am

Hello all,

New research on plant intelligence may forever change how you think about plants
http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-01-09/n ... out-plants

With metta,
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---

culaavuso
Posts: 1247
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:27 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001

Re: Can Plants think?

Postby culaavuso » Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:33 am

Plant intentionality and the phenomenological framework of plant intelligence brings a whole new perspective to the suttas talking about beings living in trees, such as MN 45.

MN 45: Cula-dhammasamadana Sutta wrote:Just as if a maluva creeper pod were to burst open in the last month of the hot season, and a maluva creeper seed were to fall at the foot of a sala tree. The deva living in the tree would become frightened, apprehensive, & anxious. Her friends & companions, relatives & kin — garden devas, forest devas, tree devas, devas living in herbs, grass, & forest monarchs — would gather together to console her: 'Have no fear, have no fear. In all likelihood a peacock is sure to swallow this maluva creeper seed, or a deer will eat it, or a brush fire will burn it up, or woodsmen will pick it up, or termites will carry it off, and anyway it probably isn't really a seed.'

User avatar
rowboat
Posts: 468
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 5:31 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 6
Location: Brentwood Bay, British Columbia

Re: Can Plants think?

Postby rowboat » Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:39 am

Cooran, I look forward to reading the New Yorker article by Michael Pollan.

"Refracted rearwards along the course of evolution, consciousness displays itself qualitatively as a spectrum of shifting shades whose lower terms are lost in the night." - Teilhard de Chardin

:anjali:
Rain soddens what is covered up,
It does not sodden what is open.
Therefore uncover what is covered
That the rain will not sodden it.
Ud 5.5

PimonratC
Posts: 124
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:03 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001
Contact:

Re: Can Plants think?

Postby PimonratC » Tue Feb 11, 2014 4:49 am

What is the difference between plants and our body ... :smile:

.

User avatar
lyndon taylor
Posts: 952
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:41 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1006
Location: Redlands, Southern California, USA
Contact:

Re: Can Plants think?

Postby lyndon taylor » Tue Feb 11, 2014 5:08 am

Duh, we have a brain!!!
18 years ago I made one of the most important decisions of my life and entered a local Cambodian Buddhist Temple as a temple boy and, for only 3 weeks, an actual Therevada Buddhist monk. I am not a scholar, great meditator, or authority on Buddhism, but Buddhism is something I love from the Bottom of my heart. It has taught me sobriety, morality, peace, and very importantly that my suffering is optional, and doesn't have to run my life. I hope to give back what little I can to the Buddhist community that has so generously given me so much, sincerely former monk John

alan
Posts: 2624
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:14 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 6
Location: Miramar beach, Fl.

Re: Can Plants think?

Postby alan » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:03 am

He's made a business of writing stories like this. Gets a lot of play in free media, but tells us nothing of any use.

User avatar
cooran
Posts: 7799
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: Can Plants think?

Postby cooran » Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:41 am

Interesting opinions here :tongue:

A little bit about Professor Pollan:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Pollan

With metta,
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---

User avatar
lyndon taylor
Posts: 952
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:41 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1006
Location: Redlands, Southern California, USA
Contact:

Re: Can Plants think?

Postby lyndon taylor » Tue Feb 11, 2014 8:19 am

In either case, if you want to reduce the killing of animals, be a vegetarian or vegan, if you want to reduce the killing of plants, be a vegetarian or vegan, as meat production kills way more plants than vegetarians do.......
18 years ago I made one of the most important decisions of my life and entered a local Cambodian Buddhist Temple as a temple boy and, for only 3 weeks, an actual Therevada Buddhist monk. I am not a scholar, great meditator, or authority on Buddhism, but Buddhism is something I love from the Bottom of my heart. It has taught me sobriety, morality, peace, and very importantly that my suffering is optional, and doesn't have to run my life. I hope to give back what little I can to the Buddhist community that has so generously given me so much, sincerely former monk John

User avatar
Spiny Norman
Posts: 3156
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 6
Location: Spam, wonderful spam

Re: Can Plants think?

Postby Spiny Norman » Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:25 am

cooran wrote:Can Plants think?


No, and I think they're better off for it. ;)
"I ride tandem with the random, Things don't run the way I planned them, In the humdrum."
Peter Gabriel lyric

Shaswata_Panja
Posts: 142
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 5:49 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1001

Re: Can Plants think?

Postby Shaswata_Panja » Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:06 am

culaavuso wrote:Plant intentionality and the phenomenological framework of plant intelligence brings a whole new perspective to the suttas talking about beings living in trees, such as MN 45.

MN 45: Cula-dhammasamadana Sutta wrote:Just as if a maluva creeper pod were to burst open in the last month of the hot season, and a maluva creeper seed were to fall at the foot of a sala tree. The deva living in the tree would become frightened, apprehensive, & anxious. Her friends & companions, relatives & kin — garden devas, forest devas, tree devas, devas living in herbs, grass, & forest monarchs — would gather together to console her: 'Have no fear, have no fear. In all likelihood a peacock is sure to swallow this maluva creeper seed, or a deer will eat it, or a brush fire will burn it up, or woodsmen will pick it up, or termites will carry it off, and anyway it probably isn't really a seed.'



Please do see M Night Shyamalan's Happening--one of the greatest film on environmental destruction ever made---and thank you for making this post..i would love to disclose more about that film but I am resisting...i think seeing your post..The Happening surely qualifies as a Dhamma film?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Happening_(2008_film)

User avatar
Mkoll
Posts: 4149
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:55 pm
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1006
Location: California, USA

Re: Can Plants think?

Postby Mkoll » Wed Feb 12, 2014 5:54 am

If you're interested in this sort of thing, I'd recommend The Secret Life of Plants: a Fascinating Account of the Physical, Emotional, and Spiritual Relations Between Plants and Man. Interesting, to say the least.

:reading:
Peace,
James

User avatar
Jason
Posts: 469
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:09 am
Which number is larger than 1000 and less than 1002: 1
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Can Plants think?

Postby Jason » Thu Feb 13, 2014 6:28 am

Reminds me of something I read the other day that's somewhat related:

What’s the Point If We Can’t Have Fun?

While I think the end falls a bit flat, what I really like about this is how Graeber points towards the narrowing ideological view of material reality that reduces animals to calculating economic actors trying to maximize some sort of self-interest, and which minimizes the role of cooperation, play, and sociability in evolution.

For one, it leads towards the conclusion that we're little more than just robots, and leaves many of life's mysteries as, well, mysteries. It also illustrates how the way we frame things can ideologically exclude different possibilities, and has the effect of acting as theoretical blinders that themselves can make us see what we want to see, or else what we're conditioned by the ruling ideology to see.

So when it comes to science, for example, we have boxed ourselves "into a world where to be scientific means to offer an explanation of behaviour in rational terms" (following the model of vulgar economists and materialists), and where things like play ("the existence of action carried out for the sheer pleasure of acting, the exertion of powers for the sheer pleasure of exerting them") and freedom (non-determined, non-rational action) strike us as mysterious aberrations that need to be explained away rather than qualities that may vary well be present in some form in nature all the way down to the subatomic level.

Who knows, it may not just be plants and animals that have the ability to 'think.'
"Sabbe dhamma nalam abhinivesaya" (AN 7.58).

leaves in the hand (Buddhist-related blog)
leaves in the forest (non-Buddhist related blog)


Return to “Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Akselim, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 3 guests